How Policing, Despite Its Flaws, Sustains the Fragile Miracle of Civilisation.
There is a quiet compact that holds modern life together. We take it for granted. It바카라™s there when traffic stops for a red light, when a domestic quarrel doesn바카라™t erupt into violence, when a crowded festival ends not in stampede but in silence. At the core of this compact is a simple expectation: that disorder, though always possible, will be restrained.
As a serving police officer in India, I바카라™ve come to understand policing not as the exercise of brute power, but as the daily act of preserving balance. Not merely preventing crime, but offering something more elusive: a sense of security. This promise is difficult to deliver바카라”and even harder to keep.
Policing is an audacious project. At its heart, it tries to do something nature has never promised바카라”to weed out violence and deception from human interaction. Because in nature, it바카라™s the strongest, cleverest, and fastest who thrive. There is no ethics, no equity, no protection for the weak. Civilization, in contrast, is a collective act of defiance. It insists that strength be bound by justice, that conflict be mediated by law.
And yet, the tools of this mission are fallible. Law enforcement relies on the idea that punishment deters wrongdoing. That fear, consequence, and collective disapproval will keep most people in check. It바카라™s not a perfect mechanism. Some learn. Others don바카라™t. But despite these imperfections, the structure holds바카라”not by force alone, but by public cooperation and shared belief.
Take any police station that serves a population of one lakh. On a conservative estimate, if each person engages in just five interactions a day바카라”with neighbors, coworkers, strangers, family members바카라”that바카라™s five lakh human engagements every 24 hours. Each one, in theory, is a potential flashpoint. Crime is, after all, just human interaction gone horribly wrong.
Yet even on the worst days, most police stations receive no more than 30 to 50 complaints of criminal victimization. That바카라™s 0.01% of total interactions. In most cases, it바카라™s far less. Even allowing for underreporting, this figure tells us something profound: that the vast majority of human engagements end peacefully, that people still choose cooperation over conflict.
But it바카라™s one we often overlook. In the echo chamber of crisis headlines and viral videos, we lose the forest for a few burning trees. Public imagination바카라”fueled by relentless media coverage바카라”can quickly turn one incident into a narrative of systemic collapse. The cartoonish chase between criminal and cop, popularized by sensationalist reporting, turns serious institutions into characters in a spectacle. The police, ever visible, are convenient targets. The rest of the criminal justice system바카라”prosecution, judiciary, corrections바카라”operates in the background, rarely subject to the same scrutiny.
When something goes wrong, the outcry is immediate. The SHO might be suspended. The SP might be transferred. Political fallout follows. But zoom out바카라”and you바카라™ll see a system still functioning, still correcting itself, still evolving.
Humans imagined ethics, not just to regulate behavior, but to elevate it. We built systems where power is exercised with consent, not coercion. We placed institutions바카라”like the police바카라”between the vulnerable and the opportunistic. And today, even in a country as complex as India, life for most people remains organized, mostly safe, and surprisingly peaceful.
So yes, be critical. Ask questions. Demand accountability. But do so with proportion and with perspective. The presence of crime does not mean the absence of order바카라”it means that the machinery of order has work to do.
Things are not as bad as we sometimes make them out to be. In fact, they바카라™re often better than we allow ourselves to believe.
O.P. Singh is an Indian Police Service officer from the Haryana cadre. He currently serves in leadership roles across policing, public administration, and governance reform. His forthcoming book, The Good Cop Manifesto, explores how field-tested police habits can help navigate real-world pressure and complexity.