Advertisement
X

Holland Review: A Knock-Off Stepford Wife Awakening In Sloth Mode

Mimi Cave's latest is a whole lot of nothing stretched over two hours, with just enough half-baked twists to make you think something바카라s coming and it never does.

IMDB

There바카라s nothing wrong with a slow burn story. Give me nothing but weird, atmospheric vibes and actors chewing the scenery like it바카라s an all-you-can-eat buffet, and I바카라ll lap it up. Some of the best horror/psychological thrillers바카라be it Zodiac (2007), Nope (2022), or Hereditary (2018)바카라take their time, letting the tension simmer until it explodes into something unforgettable. But that바카라s not Mimi Cave바카라s Holland (2025). This is a whole lot of nothing stretched over two hours, with just enough half-baked twists to make you think something바카라s coming and it never does.

Holland바카라which recently released on Amazon Prime video and is written by Andrew Sodroski바카라stars Nicole Kidman as Nancy Vandergroot, the perfect suburban wife. Her placid life in the idyllic small mid-western town of Holland, Michigan is seemingly tranquil. The film starts with Nancy suspecting her babysitter (played by Bottoms and Shiva Baby star Rachel Sennott in an inexplicably short role) of stealing just one earring. Not the pair바카라just the one. That바카라s all it takes for Nancy바카라s paranoia to spiral. But is she simply being silly or deluding herself from something bigger?

With a penchant for mysteries that is rebuffed as 바카라silly바카라 by both her husband and her lover, Nancy shifts focus and begins suspecting her husband, Fred (Matthew Macfadyen), of having an affair. He goes to too many conferences in far off towns even though he바카라s just an optometrist. He owns a Polaroid camera, but there are no Polaroid photos in their house. And we know who likes to keep Polaroid photos as trophies from watching enough true crime and period murder mysteries.

Holland still
Holland still IMDB

Then there is Dave Delgado (Gael García Bernal), a charming, brooding shop teacher at the same local school Nancy teaches. On his good days he calls child protective services on a student he believes is being abused; on his bad days, his house is attacked, he is called racial slurs and the same student he stood up for asks him to 바카라go back where he came from.바카라 This could have been a powerful and timely commentary on America바카라s rising racial tensions; instead, it바카라s thrown in haphazardly. This subplot also ends up becoming one more unexplored element in a film that can바카라t decide what it wants to be.

Nancy puts her amateur detective hat on and decides to break into Fred바카라s office to look for clues. She recruits Dave바카라s help to catch Fred philandering. They have several run-ins together but Fred cannot seem to remember his face. And this is hard to believe when that face happens to belong to Gael García Bernal! The film has several such discrepancies and just expects us to roll with it all. Nancy finds enough damning evidence that points to something far more deceptive and disturbing than philandering, but the film still does not pick up pace.

Advertisement

Bernal바카라s Dave, whose entire arc is muddled by the film바카라s clumsy attempts at social commentary, is even more forgettable. All we know about him is that he is new in this weirdly Dutch-obsessed American town and his sole motivation to do anything in the film is his desire to be with Nancy. And Nancy is a bored suburban stereotype, better manifestations of which have existed in cinema before. Stepford Wives (1975) is a prime example, more so because Kidman has starred in its 2004 remake. Holland tries to be a lot of things and ends up being nothing but a cheap, knock-off Stepford Wives aspirant. By the time the big reveal finally arrives, it바카라s time to mop the popcorn off the floors and go home. There is no deeper commentary here. The story itself is nonsense despite being so tropey.

Holland Poster
Holland Poster IMDB

Speaking of pointless, Macfadyen is wasted as Fred. We know Macfadyen can act. From the dreamy Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice (2005) to the slimy Tom Wambsgans in Succession (2018바카라2023)바카라the man has range. But here he바카라s playing a serial killer with the energy of a man who got stuck in traffic on the way to his accountant job and never quite recovered. He doesn바카라t exude menace; he just exists as a half-hearted attempt at a villain without an intimidating bone in his body.

Advertisement

Kidman, usually magnetic, is similarly squandered. She바카라s meant to be unraveling, but thanks to whatever procedures she바카라s subjected her face to, her expressions barely move. Ironically, at certain junctures her frozen face is creepier than anything in the film itself. Every time she tries to emote, it바카라s like watching something trapped in the uncanny valley. There바카라s an entire conversation to be had about the pressures put on women in the public to look a certain way, but that is for another time.

Holland is confused from start to finish. It wants to be a psychological thriller, but it lacks tension. It wants to be a mystery, but there바카라s nothing worth solving. It wants to be a social commentary, but it doesn바카라t know what it바카라s saying. If it was trying to be satirical, then it spectacularly fails there too. And structurally? It바카라s a disaster. Scenes feel out of order and stretched too thin, the dialogues are repetitive without rhythm, and the pacing is abysmal.

Advertisement
Holland still
Holland still IMDB

Holland attempts to use Dutch culture as an unsettling backdrop for something sinister, much like Ari Aster바카라s take on paganism in Hereditary and Midsommar (2019). But where Aster builds immersive dread, Holland feels puzzlingly hollow. Despite my reservations about Aster바카라s lens reducing pagan traditions to eerie, cult-like horror tropes, he at least commits to a distinct vision. While Midsommar explores themes of isolation, grief, codependency, and the seductive power of cult mindsets, Hereditary delves into generational trauma and the inescapability of fate. Holland attempts to explore themes of suburban paranoia, infidelity, and identity, but it fails to delve deeply into any of them. The film hints at psychological tension, but never fully commits to exploring the complexities of its characters.

By the time the credits rolled, I was left appreciating my own editing skills. Editing a movie, in essence, is similar to self-editing an article you바카라ve written: you move paragraphs around, cut the fluff, refine the flow. But Holland feels like someone dumped all the right ingredients into a pot and still somehow made the wrong soup. At the end of the day, this isn바카라t a whodunit or even a howdunit. This is a 바카라he did what now?바카라 moment stretched into a feature-length film. And if that바카라s the best they could do, maybe Holland should have stayed off the map.

Advertisement

Debiparna Chakraborty is an independent Film, TV and Pop Culture journalist who has been feeding into the great sucking maw of the internet since 2010.

Show comments
KR