The Bombay Poets were a group of writers who embodied novel modes of creative collaboration in the city through their practice. They바카라™ve often been likened to the French Impressionists, who gathered at cafes and created magic with their artwork. Literary critic Anjali Nerlekar argues that they were at their peak during the 60s (sathothari) and the 70s, resisting and reworking publishing practices for a cultural sphere that was learning to cope with modern technologies of representation. They were a group of mostly Indian-English writers who, through their rejection of 바카라œhigh바카라 poetic forms and eschewing of the anarchist and communist politics of the Beats and the Black Panthers, the radical defiance of the Bhakti poets and other important social and artistic movements, birthed a unique idiom to understand and interpret the city. Mythologies, like histories, gain currency through their heroes, and among the various creative individuals from the group, it was Arun Kolatkar, the 바카라˜바카라˜vanishing바카라™바카라™ poet, whose work has arguably drawn the most criticism바카라”both positive and negative. The Marathi poet, Dilip Chitre, laments the loss suffered by the Marathi literary establishment because of its ignorance of Kolatkar바카라™s Marathi oeuvre, equating it with a kind of amnesia or 바카라œblindness바카라. Many Marathi commentators refuse to elevate Kolatkar바카라™s Marathi writing to the level of 바카라œpoetry바카라. (In a conversation with me a few months ago, a senior Marathi poet disdained him by calling him little more than a 바카라œcopywriter바카라).