Advertisement
X

A 100 Years Of Conflict: How Israel Went From Mandate-Created to Apartheid State

Several international human rights watch dogs have accused Israel of perpetuating policies which segregate, discriminate and dispossess Palestinians

| Shutter Stock |

Israel came into being because of a British mandate in 1920. The initial mandate, stemming from the Balfour Declaration of 1917, was to establish a 바카라śnational home for the Jewish people.바카라ť It added that such a homeland would not to prejudice the rights of non바카라‘Jewish communities.

However, over the years, various human rights bodies have accused the Israeli government of perpetuating policies that segregate, discriminate and dispossess Palestinians; in short, apartheid. 

The Birth of Israel and Displacement of Palestinians 

While the British mandate had promised there would be no compromise of the rights of the Arab people living on the land where Israel was established, there were tensions between the two groups from the outset. 

Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948. Immediately, its Arab neighbours declared war. What ensued was the Six-Day War, which Israel won. Thereafter it began occupying the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) estimated that over 700,000 Palestinians were displaced after the war in what the Palestinians call the 바카라śnakba바카라ť. 

The ICJ, in 2024, also ruled that the takeover of land by Israel was an occupation under international law. The Hague condemned Israel바카라™s 바카라śsprawling settlements바카라ť, Israel바카라™s 바카라śoccupation바카라ť of East Jerusalem, and the Jewish State바카라™s discriminatory laws. The ICJ ruled that Israel should withdraw from East Jerusalem and its settlements should also be removed. 

As of 2025, there are over 700,000 Israeli settlers in East Jerusalem and the West Bank scattered between the Palestinians. However, the two peoples live different lives.

Palestinians face separate legal systems, restricted movement controlled via checkpoints and settler바카라‘only roads, a permit regime, and home demolitions, as the UN has documented.

Apartheid Under International Law

Apartheid is defined in the 1973 Apartheid Convention. Thereafter, the 1998 Rome Statute, and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination laid out the conditions that should be evaluated when judging if a regime practices apartheid. These include institutionalised segregation, domination intent, and inhumane acts.

There are two charges of genocide and discriminatory practices against Israel pending before the ICJ. The international court also issued an advisory in 2024 demanding that Israel remove discriminatory practices. 

Israel바카라™s Indulging in Apartheid: UN, Amnesty, and Human Rights Watch 

In 2022, UN Special Rapporteur Michael Lynk wrote about the different legal system governing Israelis and Palestinians in the area. He said there was a 바카라śdeeply discriminatory dual legal and political system바카라ť which granted Israeli settlers privileges while dispossessing Palestinians of basic rights. Lynk said the legal system바카라” with walls, numerous check points at every route, a coercive military presence, and inhumane acts by the occupying forces바카라”met all criteria for apartheid under international law.

Advertisement

Since then, Lynk바카라™s assessment has been corroborated by many UN experts including Francesca Albanese and Navi Pillay. During the 2024 Hague hearings before the ICJ, the court affirmed that Israeli practices in occupied territories were nothing short of systemic racial discrimination and apartheid.

Israeli officials criticised the UN rapporteurs reports, and thereafter refused to allow UN investigators into the area saying the charges were politically motivated. 

Amnesty International's Report

In February 2022, Amnesty published a landmark report titled 바카라śIsrael바카라™s Apartheid Against Palestinians: Cruel System of Domination and Crime Against Humanity.바카라ť The report was a study of Israel바카라™s policies through a series of questionnaires posed to Palestinian and Israeli people. The human rights watch dog documented territorial fragmentation, dispossession, movement restrictions, denial of citizenship rights of Palestinian people. Based on its study,  Amnesty concluded that Israel바카라™s practices in Gaza and West Bank constituted apartheid, a crime against humanity.

Advertisement

Israel바카라™s government, and its Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, disputed the apartheid label, calling Amnesty바카라™s report 바카라śfalse, biased and antisemitic.바카라ť The US State Department also rejected the report as 바카라śabsurd.바카라ť

Human Rights Watch's Allegations

Earlier, in 2021, the Human Rights Watch (HRW) had also said it considered Israel바카라™s occupation of Gaza, East Jerusalem and the West Bank as an apartheid and persecution regime. The HRW said Israeli occupation and laws were designed with the intent to maintain Jewish Israeli domination both within Israel바카라™s recognised borders and the occupied Palestinian territories. 

The same year, an NGO within Israel바카라” B바카라™Tselem바카라” wrote a paper that accused Israel of perpetuating 바카라śa regime of Jewish supremacy from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.바카라ť 

Show comments
KR