"History will not pardon us바카라 if the court doesn바카라t respond to the government바카라s unprecedented act, he said in his letter.
Supreme Court senior judge Kurian Joseph has written to Chief Justice Dipak Misra urging him to respond to Centre바카라s"unprecedented act of sitting on the collegium's recommendation바카라 to elevate a senior advocate Indu Malhotra and a high court judge KM Joseph to the apex court.
"History will not pardon us바카라 if the court doesn바카라t respond to the government바카라s unprecedented act that is threatening 바카라the very life and existence바카라 of the Supreme Court, The Indian Express from his letter sent to the chief justice and 22 other judges.
Justice KM Joseph, who had in April 2016 ruled against the Centre against the imposition of President바카라s rule in the Uttarakhand, currently stands at number 45 in the inter-state All India seniority of High Court Judges. According to a , that does not stand in the way of his elevation to the Supreme Court ahead of other senior High Court judges.
Delay in Indu Malhotra appointment seems to be collateral damage, suggests The Indian Express report.
He also appealed to the CJI to form a bench of seven seniormost judges to suo motu take up the matter.
"It is the first time in the history of this court where nothing is known as to what has happened to a recommendation after three months," he wrote calling it government's "abuse of power".
Justice Joseph was appointed as Permanent Judge of the Kerala High Court in 2004 and later transferred to Uttarakhand High Court where he assumed charge in 2014 as Chief Justice.
Provisions of the Constitution for appointment of judges and authority transferred to the SC collegium as a result of two judgments of the Supreme Court, first in 1993 (Supreme Court Advocate-on-Record Association case) and by a follow-up President바카라s Reference to the Court in 1998.
In the first case in 1993, the power to appoint judges was vested with the Chief Justice of India assisted by two judges of the Supreme Court. The 1998 ruling transferred that authority to a collegium headed by the Chief Justice and constituting four senior-most judges.
Speaking at another event last week, senior Supreme Court judge too had voiced "concern" on the same matter.
Justices Joseph and Chelameswar were among the four seniormost judges of the Supreme Court who addressed a press conference on January 12 and listed a litany of problems that they said were afflicting the country바카라s highest court and warned they could destroy Indian democracy. The unprecedented move left the judiciary and observers stunned.
When asked if he was worried that the government has been silent for so long, he said: "I don바카라t think 바카라worry바카라 is the right word. I am concerned about it, I am sure the Court is concerned about it."
He added that a proper performance assessment of high court judges for elevation to the top court was hardly done. The judge was speaking during a panel discussion titled 'The Indian Higher Judiciary: Issues and Prospects'.
He had said that the authorities involved in the process of selection must place their assessment on record to eliminate further problems.
Justice Kurian Joseph바카라s letter also had a warning about the threat to the independence of judiciary. 바카라More than anything else it sends a wrong message which is loud and clear to all judges down the line not to cause any displeasure to th Executive les they should suffer. Is this not a threat to the independence of the judiciary?바카라