The Supreme Court advised authorities to look at the BMC model in Mumbai to combat the Covid crisis in Delhi.
The Centre has moved the Supreme Court on the Delhi High Court바카라™s contempt warning on the availability of oxygen in light of the Covid-19 crisis. During the hearing, it asked the government how it planned to meet Delhi바카라™s oxygen demand and said that it should look to Mumbai as BMC had done a good job of handling the Covid situation.
The top court also gave the Centre a 10:30 am deadline for Thursday over the oxygen crisis. The court said, 바카라œIn a good-faith measure to submit a tabulated plan before this court, we allow Centre to submit a plan by 10.30 am."
The Supreme Court advised authorities to look at the BMC model in Mumbai to combat the Covid crisis in Delhi.
A Supreme Court bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud and comprising MR Shah heard the matter. Solicitor General Tushar Mehra represented the Union government, while senior advocate Rahul Mehra appeared on behalf of GNCTD. Mehta told the Supreme Court, 바카라œThe Centre and Delhi government are both making best efforts. This is not adversarial. Putting officers in jail will not ensure oxygen supply. The Centre is preparing a module for supplying oxygen to various states."
Justice Chandrachud told the Centre, 바카라œCalculating oxygen demands based on per bed is not scientific." It asked the Centre to 바카라œtry and extrapolate BMC model for Delhi".
The Supreme Court said that till an audit was not done, actual procurement needed to be focused on in Delhi. 바카라œCentre needs to inch closer to 700 MT for Delhi, the present supply of about 550 mt does not work."
The court asked the Centre to inform by Wednesday midnight on how much oxygen they shall supply to the national capital.
While Mehta told the court that the Centre had the formula to calculate oxygen demands and elaborated on it, the court reminded the government that needs to understand that the situation was dynamic in different parts of the country and the demand may vary. Not prudent to have a static formula.
The court told the Centre, 바카라œPlease tell us that in the next few days how will you meet the demand of Delhi." The apex court also appreciated the BMC model of combating Covid-19. The Centre agreed, saying, 바카라œThe BMC has done a commendable job."
The court asked the Centre, 바카라œWhy are the orders of supply of oxygen to Delhi not been complied with?" To which, Mehta said, 바카라œDemand for oxygen has steeply gone up. We are diverting oxygen from all possible sources. Equitable distribution of oxygen is being ensured."
Justice Chandrachud reiterated, 바카라œEffort should be to comply, we agree that putting officers in jail would not help the situation."
The Delhi High Court had directed the Centre to show cause as to why contempt not is initiated against it for failing to comply with the order on the supply of oxygen to the national capital for treating Covid-19 patients.
The Delhi High Court had asked state and centre officials to remain present in court for contempt proceedings since oxygen supply, as per Supreme Court order, was not met with.
On Tuesday a Delhi High Court bench of Justices Vipin Sanghi and Rekha Palli rejected the Centre바카라™s submission that Delhi was not entitled to 700 metric tonnes of medical oxygen in light of existing medical infrastructure.
바카라œWe see grim reality every day of people not able to secure oxygen or ICU beds in hospitals which have reduced beds due to gas shortage," it said. The high court directed two senior central government officers to be present before it on Wednesday to respond to the notice.
With PTI inputs