First, no one in a democracy can be objective, inclusive and reflective without citizens and users being engaged and active. Citizens need to be interactively involved. Second, self-assessment or internal appraisal of content priorities goes a long way. Having an active ombudsman should be formal with user바카라s participation. Third, reconnect with users distinctly. Letters to editor, guest edits, analysis, critic바카라s voice etc should be nurtured. Fourth, senior staff, both journalists and others, should be identified whenever their coverage appear. Any 바카라conflict of interest바카라 with any content should be indicated. Fifth, sources of content should always be indicated, particularly where figures and quotes are used. These sources could be varied; better not to use the same source repeatedly. Sixth, references and resources involved in coverage should be specified with timing, origin, author etc so that any apprehensions are avoided or pre-empted. Seventh, a media house should come under the RTI on its own, irrespective of the position of other media. It could even be transparent on RTI questions received. So also periodic reports, audit, monitoring, review committees etc. Eight, declare at least annually a review of news coverage, on how it was inclusive, objective and reflective. Ninth, opinion pieces should have 바카라other point바카라 as well바카라at least one 바카라other바카라 view for every three of one바카라s own. Tenth, collaborate with other established or professional institutions on contentious issues in particular, instead of taking a solo view. Eleventh, there is nothing wrong for