Is it possible that the absence of a Nehru-Gandhi at the helm of affairs in the Congress party will force Narendra Modi, for once, fight elections on livelihood issues?
With trends for the Lok Sabha polls making it clear now that the Congress party is in for total decimation yet again, here바카라s a thought 바카라 should Rahul Gandhi, who has now unambiguously proven his inability to pose any credible electoral challenge to Narendra Modi바카라s BJP, resign as president of the Grand Old Party?
There is a deafening silence from Gandhi so far on the trends but he is expected to address the media later in the day. Will it be, true to Congress tradition in times of failure, yet another assertion of the 바카라need for introspection바카라 바카라 chintan and manthan 바카라 as the party바카라s old guard would often say after an electoral debacle?
Rahul Gandhi has, since he first began leading the party바카라s poll campaigns as Congress vice president over five years ago, displayed no qualms in accepting responsibility for defeat each time his party has lost, be it in the 2014 general elections or in nearly a dozen state assembly polls. But, does merely owning responsibility for defeat mean anything?
Since Thursday morning as one Congress bastion after the other began drifting towards the BJP, with Rahul himself trailing in the family pocketborough of Amethi behind old rival, Smriti Irani, it was evident that the charm of the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty and the sense of history that it once evoked have all but vanished; perhaps slayed by an acerbic Narendra Modi바카라s relentless campaign against the 바카라naamdaars바카라 or perhaps just a natural result of the law of diminishing returns.
Is it possible that the absence of a Nehru-Gandhi at the helm of affairs in the Congress party will force Modi and the BJP to abandon the vitriolic, yet popular with the voters, campaign against the dynasty and, for once, fight elections on livelihood issues? A flashback of the 2019 and 2014 Lok Sabha campaigns as also of several assembly poll contests shows that Mission Modi has been to demolish the Nehru-Gandhi legacy. Why then should Gandhi enable his nemesis? Why not bow out and let a non-dynast run the party?
It isn바카라t as if these questions have never been raised in the past. Similar questions were raised by P.V. Narasimha, the second non-Nehru-Gandhi to lead a Congress government as Prime Minister, in the early 1990s when a section of the party wanted Sonia Gandhi to take the political plunge. They were raised again when she actually did take the political plunge in 1997 and led the party to defeat in the general elections that happened the following year. But then, by 2004, Sonia proved her deftness at politics, reviving her party바카라s dwindling fortunes and stitching the UPA coalition that held power at the Centre for the next decade. Rahul Gandhi, however, has, in his 19-year-long political career repeatedly failed to display the political astuteness of his mother.
Leaders who have questioned Rahul바카라s capabilities in steering his party towards revival have often been shown the door by the Congress or simply fallen out of favour with the Nehru-Gandhis. But even those who have remained within the circle of confidence of the party바카라s First Family, on the condition of anonymity, often question their party president바카라s aptitude in politics. As the trends began to turn into concrete results against the Congress, there was already a hushed gossip within many party leaders about 바카라yet another debacle under Rahul Gandhi바카라 and some talked about his 바카라misplaced self-assurance that his Chowkidar Chor Hai assault on Modi was turning the tide in favour of the Congress바카라.
It is unlikely that any leader of consequence within the Congress party will dare to raise these questions publicly. For, as is often said within the Congress circles, 바카라the Nehru-Gandhi family is the glue that keeps the party together바카라.
A senior Congress leader told Outlook that 바카라even if Rahul actually offers to resign, everyone within the party will huddle around him to convince him otherwise because, without a Nehru-Gandhi at the top, the party will simply collapse because every factional leaders will be at the other's throat in no time바카라. There alone, the Congress leader said, lies the party바카라s problem 바카라 바카라we aren바카라t getting anywhere with Rahul and we won바카라t be anywhere without him바카라.
Going by the sycophants club that the Congress is, it is highly plausible that even if Rahul does offer to step aside, there will be calls for his sister, Priyanka Gandhi to take over. Though Priyanka appears more politically savvy, her record in these elections 바카라 the first that the party contested after her actual political debut 바카라 has been pathetic to say the least. With the exception of Sonia바카라s constituency of Rae Bareli, nearly every seat where Priyanka campaigned has the BJP leading. Further, her role as the party바카라s in-charge general secretary of eastern UP hardly paid any dividends.
Ironically, just as this general election saw many in the common public asking 바카라 if not Modi then who, the question within the Congress on the leadership remains, if not a Nehru-Gandhi, then who? Who indeed?