Advertisement
X

Shamelessness Their Shield: Airlines Betray Lack of Spine

The Kunal Karma 'heckling' case tells us a lot about our government, powerful journalists바카라and how they can gang up to terrorise a flyer if he irritates a celebrity loyal to the ruling dispensation, writes Shastri Ramachandran.

Chronology samajhiye. On January 28, aboard IndiGo바카라s Mumbai-Lucknow flight, comedian Kunal Kamra confronts Republic TV바카라s Arnab Goswami. Kamra then posts a video on Twitter of his monologue 바카라heckling바카라 Goswami. IndiGo quickly responds and states on its website that the comedian is banned for six months. Soon after, a minister 바카라advises바카라 other airlines to impose similar restrictions on Kamra. Air India, SpiceJet and GoAir follow suit and ban Kamra on their flights 바카라until further notice바카라.

AirAsia India and Vistara did not put Kamra on their no-fly list. Acting on a minister바카라s advice would have been against regulations. Only on the basis of written orders, it is said, can airlines skip the process laid down by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). DGCA rules require issues, such as unruly behaviour on a flight, to be investigated by an airline바카라s internal committee. Indigo did not follow any rules or prescribed procedure, according to the flight바카라s pilot in charge, who was not even consulted. The three other airlines treated the minister바카라s advice as an order.

One did not see either the airlines or a minister act with such alacrity when a Member of Parliament beat an Air India staff with his chappals in September 2017. Air India did not act so swiftly then as it did against Kamra now. When MP Pragya Thakur created a ruckus incident on a flight, no action was taken. Neither the airline nor the minister did anything though the incident delayed the flight.

The Kamra case tells us a lot about powerful journalists, government et al바카라and how they can gang up to terrorise a flyer if he irritates a celebrity with connections. It also tells us of the contempt of the high and mighty for due process. It is a shame that these four airlines banned a passenger for 바카라unruly behaviour바카라 without adequate inquiry. Three of them did it because a minister said so. And, we think this happens only in a banana republic. Doubtless, some TV anchors dedicated to the ruling cult have ceased to be journalists. But, can that be reason enough for a minister to 바카라order바카라 airlines to ban a comedian for 바카라heckling바카라 Goswami on a flight without observing the due process?

The pilot, Rohit Mateti, has, in an email to IndiGo, set down the case in detail, showing there was no case for a ban on Kamra. Objecting to the ban, Mateti states that while Kamra바카라s conduct was 바카라unacceptable and verbally abusive바카라, he complied with the crew바카라s instructions and the offence did not fall within even Level 1, which entails debarment for three months.

Advertisement

Thus, IndiGo is guilty of transgressing regulations, as may be Air India, GoAir and SpiceJet.

Why airlines jump to do what a minister 바카라advises바카라 them to, even if it바카라s not within the rules? Is it because they have much to fear in terms of compliance or on other counts? If their records are clean, why should they바카라especially, airlines that had nothing to do with the 바카라heckling바카라바카라execute such an order? Could they not check with the DGCA what is expected of them?

(The author is Editorial Consultant, WION TV. Views expressed are personal.)

Show comments
KR