Amnesty International India today said Jammu and Kashmir government바카라s refusal to pay compensation to a man who was strapped to a jeep and paraded by army personnel is a callous attempt at evading its human rights obligations.
Amnesty International India today said Jammu and Kashmir government바카라s refusal to pay compensation to a man who was strapped to a jeep and paraded by army personnel is a callous attempt at evading its human rights obligations.
On 27 October, the Jammu and Kashmir Home Department rejected a recommendation from the State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) to give Farooq Dar INR 1,000,000 (about USD 15,300) as compensation for 바카라humiliation, physical [and] psychological torture, stress, wrongful restraint and confinement바카라.
The Home Department said it could not accept the recommendation because 바카라there were no accusation of human rights violations levelled against the state government바카라 and that there was 바카라no scheme or policy바카라 under which the compensation could be paid, among other reasons.
바카라The Jammu and Kashmir government claims that it was not responsible for violating Farooq Dar바카라s rights, but refusing to pay him compensation for torture is also a human rights violation,바카라 said Zahoor Wani, Senior Campaigner at Amnesty International India.
바카라The fact that Farooq Dar was tied to an army jeep and paraded is not in dispute. Authorities have an obligation to provide him with adequate remedy, which includes compensation, and ensure that those suspected of responsibility are prosecuted in civilian courts.바카라
바카라The Jammu and Kashmir government must not look for excuses to shirk its obligations. The Union Ministry of Defence should also ensure that the Army cooperates with the civilian investigation. This case should not join the long list of allegations against security force personnel in Kashmir which have gone unpunished in the last 27 years,바카라 Wani said.
바카라This incident highlights the need for a strong law to combat torture and other ill-treatment. India needs to urgently ratify the UN Convention against Torture, as recommended recently by India바카라s Law Commission.바카라
Farooq Dar was strapped to a moving Indian Army jeep and driven around for over five hours in Budgam district on 9 April this year after casting a vote of the day of polling for a parliamentary seat of Srinagar.
Senior Army officials and central government functionaries later claimed that Army personnel had tied Farooq Dar to the jeep as a 바카라human shield바카라 to deter people from throwing stones at their convoy.
On the basis of reports from the Jammu and Kashmir Police and statements by doctors from government hospitals in Srinagar, the SHRC ruled that Farooq Dar 바카라did not suffer only humiliation publically but also suffered trauma which resulted in psychiatric stress which may remain with him for the rest of his life바카라.
Amnesty said military investigations into human rights violations lack independence and have in the past served to shield perpetrators from prosecution. Prosecutions of security force personnel in J&K have seldom progressed due to restrictions imposed by the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1990 (AFSPA).
Section 7 of the AFSPA provides virtual immunity for human rights violations by security force personnel, as any civilian prosecution can only proceed after obtaining prior sanction from the central government. In the 27 years that the law has been in force in Jammu and Kashmir, not once has sanction been granted by the central government.