The women wrestlers have told the court that 바카라they were touched inappropriately(by WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh) under the pretext of checking their breath. If that is not force, what else is?바카라
The women wrestlers have made their submissions to the court saying that they were touched inappropriately under the pretext of checking their breath by WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
The women wrestlers have told the court that 바카라they were touched inappropriately(by WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh) under the pretext of checking their breath. If that is not force, what else is?바카라
According to The Indian Express report each victim has told the court that they had to free themselves 바카라from the clutches of the accused바카라.
The report said the Rouse Avenue court was told by six women wrestlers that they were sexually harassed by then WFI (Wrestling Federation of India) and BJP Lok Sabha MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh.
The submissions were made by senior advocate Rebecca John, who represented the women wrestlers, as the court heard arguments on framing of charges against Singh and suspended WFI assistant secretary Vinod Tomar, the report said.
바카라The wrestlers told the court that they were touched inappropriately under the pretext of checking their breath. If that is not force, what else is?바카라 the submissions made by John said, the report mentioned.
She told the court that intimidation was also involved along with sexual assault and called the two offences 바카라interlinked바카라, the report said.
John said that in each case the victims faced discomfort, which emerged out of lack of consent, it mentioned.
바카라Is the accused a doctor바카라why was he checking their breath,바카라 she asked, as per the report.
Reading out complaints of the six wrestlers, John told the court that in many of these, the wrestlers had mentioned that they had tried to push away the accused. This, she said, amounted to use of force and, therefore, an offence was made out under IPC Section 354 (assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty), the report said.
During earlier hearings on framing of charges, Rajiv Mohan, representing Bhushan, had argued that only 바카라hugging바카라 did not amount to sexual assault, and thus did not form a case under Section 354, the report said.