IĀ was very much at the forefront of arguing for the Sabarimala issue. At the same time, I want to make it clear that it wasn바카라t as if I wanted to go and pray in the temple바카라some may call me an atheist. But, speaking for those who do want to go, the fact is that women as a class, as a gender, have the right to enter all public spaces. And I am sorry to have to say this loud and clear, but I had to tell the court that this was discrimination based on menstruation. The lawyers of the Supreme Court did not want to use the word menstruation, as if it never happened to us, until we had to say it loud and clear. And till today, those who oppose the judgment in the SabariĀmala case are saying this is not discrimination based on sex, because girls under the age of 10 and women over 50 are allowed to enter the temple바카라but what happens betĀween 10 and 50, well, I don바카라t know! I remember what one of the lawyers told me when I asked the person if she/he would be coming to Āaddress the court; the reply I got was, 바카라No, no, I don바카라t feel comfortable talking about blood in the courtroom.바카라 I said, then what about murder? You talk about blood all the time when there바카라s murder.