Advertisement
X

Delhi Vs Mumbai: An Actor's Struggle Captures A Cultural Divide

'In Delhi, we used to do rehearsals; we worked on character, voice. In Mumbai, it was about completing one job and finding the next one,' notes an actor

Dibyendu Bhattacharya remembers it like it was yesterday. National School of Drama (NSD) was the reason he moved out of Kolkata for the first time in 1991. He바카라d just won the Best Actor award from the Indian People바카라s Theatre Association (IPTA) three years ago. Having moved to the centrally-located theatre hub of Delhi, Mandi House, he soon realised that he was surrounded by embassies screening acclaimed films. 바카라My days would end with watching Kurosawa바카라 recounts Bhattacharya, 바카라and sometimes even plays in Mandi House. Also, I had the fantastic library in NSD at my disposal. It was a different kind of experience. I바카라d never lived such a regimented life.바카라

Bhattacharya is among a rarified group of actors (such as Manoj Bajpayee, Ashutosh Rana, Manoj Pahwa, Naseeruddin Shah, Om Puri and Neena Gupta, among others) who sharpened their skills in theatre in Delhi first, before making the move to Mumbai for films. He was largely unfazed by the new city, instead, he took a liking to it immediately. It바카라s safe to say that Bhattacharya is among the exceptions, considering the contrasting cultures of the two cities. While Mandi House witnesses more art-based, social-justice driven works, the hubs of Mumbai바카라Juhu, Versova, etc., have a more factory quality to them. The objective is to ensure the steady churning out of films, shows, plays. It바카라s a starkly different approach that most actors have to grapple with when they make the switch. Even Shah Rukh Khan, who had worked with Delhi바카라s theatre veteran Barry John, had to reinvent his approach after tasting success at the beginning stages of his career in the early 바카라90s, moving from Mani Kaul and Ketan Mehta to Aditya Chopra, Rakesh Roshan and Karan Johar.

Dibyendu Bhattacharya
Dibyendu Bhattacharya

Comparing an actor바카라s struggles in Mandi House and Versova maps out the differing cultures of two fundamentally disparate cities. But it also tells a fascinating story of how these two cultures have gone on to influence and contaminate each other.

Unlike his contemporaries, Mohd Zeeshan Ayyub didn바카라t undergo much of a Mumbai struggle, when he moved to the city in 2009. 바카라I shifted to Mumbai in December, 2009. By February 2, 2010, I was shooting for No One Killed Jessica (2011). While shooting this, I got Mere Brother Ki Dulhan (2011). A little later, I was offered Shahid (2013) and Jannat 2 (2012).바카라 Often telling people how lucky he got with his start in Mumbai, Ayyub mentions how his friends have asked him to rephrase his answer by blaming his talent for the persistent breakthroughs.

Actor Mohd Zeeshan Ayyub
Actor Mohd Zeeshan Ayyub | Photo: Getty Images

The 40-year-old actor, who broke into mainstream consciousness with Raanjhanaa (2013), went to NSD in the mid-2000s. Even though he didn바카라t work at Mandi House (he did do the odd play at Kamani Auditorium, Shri Ram Centre), he spent a lot of time in that environment. 바카라The culture, I would say, was overall good. You would find the frustrated ones here too. Sometimes, their frustration was justified.바카라 During his time, Ayyub recounts how there was still some purity intact in the pursuit of craft, something he notes has been diminishing in the last few years. 바카라When film stars like Naseeruddin Shah, Om Puri would come to NSD, we would be eager to learn from them, but we wouldn바카라t be starstruck.바카라 Ayyub says he hasn바카라t been able to go to Mandi House in the last five years because it draws unnecessary attention, selfies and autographs. 바카라Now, Bollywood has reached the deeper recesses of such places. The whole point of theatre is only to enter films.바카라

Advertisement
바카라In Delhi, we used to do rehearsals; we worked on character, voice. In Mumbai, it was about completing one job and finding the next one.바카라

Ashish Vidyarthi, who graduated from NSD in 1990 and worked in N.K. Sharma바카라s Act One (one of Delhi바카라s more famous theatre groups), says theatre as a stepping-stone for films was a thing even in his time. 바카라In our time, there was no such process of screen-testing,바카라 says Vidyarthi, 바카라we would wonder what바카라s the best way to reach Bombay. It was a mysterious thing, landing a film.바카라 So much so that Vidyarthi remembers colleagues who would spend years doing theatre, only so someone would spot them.

But that also didn바카라t mean short-cuts. 바카라In Delhi, we used to do rehearsals; we worked on character, voice. In Mumbai, it was about completing one job and finding the next one,바카라 notes the Drohkaal actor. 바카라The former one was in pursuit of art; the goal was to improve. In Mumbai, your ability to find more work is put to test.바카라

Advertisement

Ayyub says he바카라s concerned about recent NSD graduates. 바카라Between an ordinary aspiring actor and an NSD graduate바카라there used to be an edge that the NSD actor had with their knowledge. That edge has depleted.바카라 The Zero actor thinks it바카라s the most unfortunate thing that, these days, he can바카라t tell the difference between an NSD graduate and an Aram Nagar aspirant. 바카라It바카라s been flattened out.바카라

As much as Ayyub would like to blame success stories바카라like Bajpayee, Vidyarthi, Deepak Dobriyal, Gajraj Rao and Rana바카라he would also like to place the blame on journalists who have turned their stories of struggle into myths.

After his move to Mumbai in 1992, Vidyarthi remembers the pace of life picking up. 바카라With the monthly rent to be paid, there wasn바카라t a single day we couldn바카라t be working or not looking for work. The off-time disappeared.바카라 Ayyub recollects the two most valuable lessons he got in his early days in Mumbai from actors Vineet Kumar and Manoj Pahwa. 바카라Vineet bhai disabused me of my notions of wanting to do 바카라good work바카라. He said what I was doing in Delhi was good work. The Mumbai industry was a marketplace, and my primary job was to sell myself and make money.바카라

Advertisement

It바카라s Pahwa바카라s lesson that is probably a bit more polished. He told Ayyub about this tea stall in front of Infiniti Mall (in Andheri), called mini-Mandi House because of the sheer number of actors hanging there. Ayyub would meet actors there who would claim to have been in over 80 films and own three houses in Mumbai. But he wouldn바카라t be able to place them in a single film. 바카라The struggle, he told me, is not to get work,바카라 says Ayyub, 바카라It바카라s to get the work of your choice.바카라

Bhattacharya notes how the pockets of struggling actors are slowly evaporating, considering you could be picked from anywhere. 바카라It바카라s become a lot cheaper to struggle now. In our time, you had to print out photographs costing Rs 15-30 per photograph and leave four-five of them in places you might never even hear from. The goal was to distribute it as far and wide as possible.바카라

Advertisement

When asked about the one skill they learned from Mandi House and Versova, Vidyarthi responds with how Delhi helped hone his absorption skills. In Mumbai, there바카라s an urgency to the work. It has to be finished then and there. Ayyub says Delhi taught him to pour everything into his work, no half measures. While Versova taught him to detach himself from work, and move on to the next thing.

Once the ground zero for idealism (and even virtuousness), Mandi House has slowly ceded ground to casting directors casting for the umpteen talking parts in OTT shows. It means that the period for striving has reduced significantly, without the promise of a long, successful career. Similarly, Mumbai has witnessed a parallel line-up of 바카라바카라stars바카라바카라 like Manoj Bajpayee, Nawazuddin Siddiqui and Pankaj Tripathi바카라almost unthinkable two decades ago. It바카라s cut both ways.

Ayyub sums up the aspect that pains him the most, 바카라Success has been diminished to amassing wealth, wearing a suit, and going to award functions jahaan aap gandi Angrezi bolne ki koshish karenge (where you바카라ll attempt to speak in broken English).바카라

(This appeared in the print as 'Dramatis Personae')

Show comments
KR