Advertisement
X

Bolé To Blockbuster: It's Been A Golden Run For Bollywood In 2018

Eight films tip over Rs 100 cr in eight months, Bollywood바카라s having a golden run this year

It바카라s raining gold in tinselville, and in torrents, if you please! The rupee may have tumbled against the mighty dollar lately, giving a blow to the economy elsewhere, but Bollywood appears to be unfazed for now. A string of hits has swelled the coffers of the world바카라s largest film industry, which looks poised to register its most robust performance at the box office in a long time this year.

In just eight months, eight movies have crossed the Rs 100-crore threshold. That바카라s something, considering there were eight films in all to cross that coveted mark last year바카라excluding the multi-lingual Baahubali 2바카라and the tally of such hits stood at just seven and six res­pectively in 2016 and 2015. And 2018 still awaits its last quarter, the most productive season for films. Thus, B-town appears to be in for an extended windfall of hits. For an industry reeling under the debacle of big-budget projects not so long ago, the turnaround could not have come at a better time.

What exactly has heralded this happy season? Did the neo-peddlers of 70 mm dreams finally crack that elusive box-office code? Far from it. There is still no fixed formula for success, and unpredictability remains the only predictable trait of the audiences.

Rajkumar Hirani on Sanju

바카라No one can predict the box office. I would have been happy with half of Sanju바카라s ­success. The final result surprised me.바카라


바카라I think in Sanju, people found a connect with the ­father-son relationship and the friends바카라 story. The only reason I made this film was that it evoked an emotion in me.바카라

Look at what Hindi cinema바카라s big basket of hits had to offer to them since January: A biopic of a filmstar, a freaky horror-comedy, a gritty quest for an Olympic gold바카라a veritable assortment of movies from div­erse genres. There are, of course, dead giveaways as to what makes a movie succeed. Many would put content as the sine qua non, but some past exa­mples have shown that it does not guarantee a hit. Although, movies clicking despite horrible content are still a dime a dozen, and the trend has been no different lately. Good, bad and ugly, all kinds of films have passed muster with the audiences. Factors such as star popularity, smart promotional campaigns and even a controversy have played key roles. At the end of the day, numbers remain the ultimate touchstone for judging the worth of a movie, with or without good content.

Advertisement

Among this year바카라s illustrious fare so far, the crown goes to Sanju, Rajkumar Hirani바카라s biopic on Sanjay Dutt바카라s life. With a collection of Rs 334 crore, it turned out to be Ranbir Kapoor바카라s first movie to surpass the Rs 300-crore mark. Post-release, Hirani was criticised for showcasing Dutt바카라s life in too positive a light but the row only added to its box-office appeal. Of course, Sanju, with Hirani바카라s impeccable storytelling, Ranbir바카라s sincere performance, a brilliant supporting cast and all the dope on Dutt바카라s life, was destined to be a blockbuster without the need of controversies. But, if a popular B-town maxim is anything to go by, a bit of controversy never harms a film.

Deepika padukone on Padmavat

바카라The female-protagonist epic heralded a welcome and much-needed change.바카라


바카라What we did not expect was people ­commuting from one state to another to be able to watch Padmavat.바카라

Hirani thinks a film succeeds for various reasons. 바카라It has to find a connect with the viewers,바카라 he tells Outlook. 바카라If it engages them, entertains them, evokes some emotions in them or makes them think, it works. I think in Sanju, people found a connect with the father-son ­relationship and the friends바카라 story. The only reason I made this film was that it evoked an emotion in me.바카라

Advertisement

Hirani confesses that he never thought Sanju would do so well. 바카라No one can predict the box office. I would have been happy with half of its success,바카라 he says. 바카라I initially thought that many people did not want to see it because there was negativity around the subject. But the final response did surprise me.바카라

Incidentally, both the biggest grossers of the year, Sanju and Padmavat, had their share of controversies. Sanjay Leela Bhansali바카라s Padmavat became a subject of primetime news debate after Rajput fringe groups protested against its purported depictions. Bhansali was forced to reschedule the film바카라s release and change its title from Padmavati to Padmavat. Post-release, the film rec­eived flak for allegedly glorifying jauhar (mass self-immolation by women in ­medieval times). All this certainly did not stop the movie from becoming the first blockbuster of the year with a kitty of Rs 282.28 crore.

But Deepika Padukone, who played Padmavati on screen, says that people connected with the film for its content and presentation. 바카라One cannot anticipate, success or failure. But what we most certainly did not expect was people commuting from one state to ano­ther to be able to watch Padmavat with their families,바카라 says Deepika about the film, which had been banned by a few state governments.

Advertisement

Deepika avers that Padmavat also paved the way for big-budget films with female protagonists. 바카라I knew it from the very beginning. It was a welcome and much-needed change,바카라 she adds.

When Deepika signed Padmavat, people cautioned her that her third collaboration with Bhansali could be repetitive. 바카라But he (Bhansali) is a magician. He has a way of breaking you down. He digs so deep that you start discovering new things about yourself. And that process not only makes you better at your craft but also better as a human being.바카라

It remains a moot point whether Padmavat would have been as big a hit without the controversies, but two movies with female protagonists, Raazi and Stree, required no storm to hit the bull바카라s eye. Raazi, which starred Alia Bhatt in the central role, raked in Rs 122.39 crore, while Shraddha Kapoor바카라s Stree also hit a jackpot with its horror-meets-comedy plot. It made more than Rs 116 crore in its first 25 day-run, approximately five times more than its budget.

Advertisement
Shraddha Kapoor on Stree

바카라Without good ­content, no film can fly the way Stree is doing right now.바카라


바카라All I knew when I signed Stree was that this was a brilliantly unique story. Now that it has become so huge, being loved by the aud­ience and breaking records, it바카라s a cherry on the cake.바카라

Shraddha feels a combination of factors contribute to a film바카라s success. 바카라Right from the script to the post-production, every small thing plays an imp­ortant part,바카라 she says. 바카라The same has happened with Stree. Each member from the cast and crew added in their way to the success of this film which we are all so proud of today.바카라

Shraddha too didn바카라t think that Stree would be such a big success when she was offered the lead role in the film. 바카라All I knew was that this was a brilliantly unique story,바카라 she says. 바카라Now that it has become so huge, being loved by the aud­ience and breaking records, it바카라s a cherry on the cake.바카라

Shraddha calls Stree바카라s content its USP. 바카라Without good content, no film can fly the way Stree is doing right now. I feel so glad and proud,바카라 she says.

Shraddha바카라s ­co-star Pankaj Tripathi, who plays a key role in the movie, says that the audiences always look forward to unique content. 바카라We have to provide the content they are looking for and Stree provided precisely that,바카라 he tells Outlook.

Tripathi believes that Stree바카라s success will go a long way in strengthening the demand for original content: 바카라This movie showed an Indian village pond, not the Swiss Alps, and its characters wore regular clothes, not the designer ones. Its entire focus was on content and that바카라s why the viewers connected with it.바카라

Stree바카라s writer-producer duo, Raj Nidimoru and Krishna D.K. concur with Tripathi바카라s opinion. 바카라Stree is a solid genre-bender, depicting small-town innocence in the backdrop of a scary setting to bring in the right dose of horror and comedy,바카라 says Raj. 바카라The right amalgamation of horror and comedy to create something unique and entertaining paid off.바카라

Krishna says though its script was solid, they didn바카라t expect such a response. 바카라We are surprised at how well it has worked,바카라 he said. 바카라This has exceeded our wildest expectations.바카라

Film-maker Rakhee Sandilya says that Raazi and Stree worked because of the out-of-the-box treatment given to their plots. Sandilya, who made the critically acclaimed Ribbon last year, says Raazi was based on the clichéd India-Pakistan theme but the way it was handled made all the difference,바카라 she points out.

Does all this box office good luck mean the lines between content-driven and commerce-driven cinema are blurring? 바카라Well, yes and no,바카라 says trade expert Atul Mohan. 바카라A movie with a good storyline and great performances always does well, but a bad film does not always fail.바카라

Mohan, editor of the trade journal, Complete Cinema, explains that some bad movies, especially the ones starring big stars, do well solely because of their fan following. 바카라The fans go to the theatres to see their favourite stars, and nothing else,바카라 he says.

The collections of Salman Khan-starrer Race 3 bear testimony to this. In spite of being pilloried for its hackneyed plot and stale performances, it did a business of Rs 166.15 core and emerged as the third biggest grosser of the year. The success of the other entrants to the Rs 100-crore club, such as Baaghi 2 and Sonu Ke Titu Ki Sweety, also underlined the fact that formula films were in no hurry to leave Bollywood. Baaghi 2, in fact, collected over Rs 25 crore on the first day of its release, a feat which was previously believed to have been the sole preserve of the three Khans바카라Salman, Aamir and Shahrukh.

Prabhat Choudhary, founder of Spice, one of the key promotional agencies in the industry, which handled many big hits this year, says that positioning and marketing have always played a role in a film바카라s success. 바카라What is new is that of late, we are dealing with a very discerning audience, who is not swayed by gimmicks or controversies,바카라 he says. 바카라Sincerity is what attracts them. If a character has spent two or three years preparing for the role and its efforts ref­lect on the screen, it gets the required attention span of the viewers.바카라

Audiences appreciated such efforts in Sanju, he says, right from the day Ranbir바카라s looks, bearing uncanny similarities with Sanjay Dutt, were revealed. 바카라People won바카라t spend Rs 250 on a ticket just for a gimmick or controversy,바카라 he says. 바카라Besides, nothing can be predicted about the fate of a movie.바카라

This proved true this year as well. Many movies which were expected to do well bit the dust while some had an unexpected dream run. While Raid, Satyamev Jayate, PadMan, Veere Di Wedding and Parmanu did very well, big flops like Fanney Khan, Saheb Biwi Aur Gangster 3, Yamla Pagla Deewana Phir Se, Paltan, and Kaalakandi sought to prick the Bollywood boom bubble intermittently. The dubious distinction of the flop of all flops went to Bhavesh Joshi Superhero, starring Anil Kapoor바카라s son Harshvardhan, which had a net collection of merely Rs 1.45 crore.

Thankfully, a few small-budget movies with good content such as Pari and Mulk did fair business alongside the big hits. Mulk, a thought-provoking movie depicting the predicament of a patriotic Muslim family, earned not only rave revi­ews but also collected about Rs 25 crore at the box office, primarily bec­ause of positive word-of-mouth.

Anubhav Sinha, the director of Mulk, who has directed movies like Ra.One (2011) in the past, says his film had an opening of measly Rs 1.5 crore but it withstood all challenges to reach a res­pectable figure eventually. 바카라What is rem­arkable is that my film earned both critical and commercial acclaim. It rarely happens,바카라 he says.

Now, with a few months still to go, Bollywood can rest assured that it will have a fitting finale this year. As many big-banner movies, such as Aamir Khan바카라s Thugs of Hindostan, Rajinikanth-Akshay Kumar starrer 2.0, Indra Kumar바카라s Total Dhamaal, Shahrukh바카라s Zero and Rohit Shetty바카라s Simbba, are lined up for release in the last quarter, the windfall could run through right till the end.

***

Sanju

  • Ranbir Kapoor, Anushka Sharma, Paresh Rawal, Vicky Kaushal
  • 334.57*, June 29**

Padmavat

  • Ranveer Singh, Shahid Kapoor, Deepika Padukone
  • 282.28, January 25

Baaghi 2

  • Tiger Shroff, Disha Patani,Manoj Bajpayee
  • 160. 74, March 30

Race

  • Salman Khan, Anil Kapor, Bobby Deol, Jacqueline Fernandez
  • 166.15, June 15

Stree

  • Rajkummar Rao, Shraddha Kapoor, Pankaj Tripathi
  • 116.76#, August 31

Raazi

  • Alia Bhatt, Vicky Kaushal, Jaideep Ahlawat
  • 122.39, May 11

Gold

  • Akshay Kumar, Mouni Roy, Amit Sadh
  • 102.27, August 15

Sonu Ke Titu ki Sweety

  • Kartik Aryan, Nushrat Bharucha, Sunny Nijar
  • 100.80, February 23

*Net collections in India in Rs crore (based on trade sources) ** Release date

#Till September 24 (In 25 days)

Show comments
KR