Art & Entertainment

Putul Nacher Itikatha Review |A Haunting Adaptation Of A Literary Classic

Ideated by Suman Mukhopadhyay, the film stirs thoughts that wander beyond Manik Bandyopadhyay바카라s original story, yet stay faithful to its essence.

Putul Nacher Itikatha Still
Putul Nacher Itikatha Still Photo: Debarati Gupta
info_icon

Any Bengali of my class and generation is well aware of this iconic phrase: 바카라Shorir, shorir! Tomar mon nai Kusum?!바카라 (바카라Body, body! Don바카라t you have a mind, Kusum?!바카라)

This sharp rebuke by Doctor Shashi in response to Kusum바카라s physical바카라or rather, sexual바카라advance has etched itself into the collective Bengali psyche, ever since it appeared in the novel by one of Bengal바카라s literary stalwarts, Manik Bandyopadhyay, in his Putul Nacher Itikatha (The Puppet바카라s Tale).

Now, eminent theatre practitioner and filmmaker Suman Mukhopadhyay바카라s adaptation of this celebrated novel has stirred intrigue again, especially after the news broke that it was selected for the Big Screen Competition at the International Film Festival Rotterdam (IFFR).

Adapting a literary classic for the screen is arguably one of the most demanding creative tasks a filmmaker can undertake. Suman Mukhopadhyay has been taking on this challenge since his debut film, Herbert (2005), based on Nabarun Bhattacharya바카라s cult novel.

Revisiting a literary saga through the lens of cinema바카라nearly 90 years after its publication바카라is a unique journey, both for the filmmaker and the discerning audience. I had read the novel more than two decades ago, during my early college years. Before watching the film, I tried to recall 바카라...Itikatha바카라, but no specific events came to mind apart from a few hazy impressions of the Gaodiya village and Kusum바카라s unfulfilled longing. As a result, the film revealed itself to me without the weight of the novel.

Putul Nacher Itikatha Still
Putul Nacher Itikatha Still Photo: Debarati Gupta
info_icon

The film opens with a wide shot of a river바카라its still water mirroring a cloud-laden grey sky so seamlessly that the sky seems like an old companion of the river. A boat glides slowly through the frame, hinting at the landscape where this 바카라Puppet바카라s Tale바카라 is about to unfold. Soon after, our protagonist, Dr. Shashi (Abir Chatterjee), is seen getting off the boat, only to stumble upon a death. Haru바카라s lifeless body stands eerily upright, clinging to the trunk of a massive banyan tree. Both Haru and the tree appear to have been struck by lightning, frozen in the moment of that violent encounter with nature.

Mukhopadhyay바카라s film builds its narrative around three central figures바카라Jadab Pandit (Dhritiman Chatterjee), Sen Didi (Ananya Chatterjee), and Kusum (Jaya Ahsan) with her household바카라unravelled through Doctor Shashi바카라s monologue.

Jadab Pandit is like a hundred-year-old banyan tree바카라deeply rooted in age-old, regressive traditions, fully aware that a storm is coming to uproot him, but unwilling to change. He proudly clings to these beliefs, outright rejecting Shashi바카라s modern medical science. For Jadab, anyone unfamiliar with Surjya Siddhanta (the ancient Indian text on the Sun God) is unfit to diagnose illness. Yet, despite ideological differences, both Jadab and his wife share a deep affection for Shashi.

Putul Nacher Itikatha Still
Putul Nacher Itikatha Still Photo: Debarati Gupta
info_icon

Sen Didi is the much younger wife of the elderly Kaviraj (Ayurvedic practitioner) Jamini. Always warm and affectionate towards Shashi, her striking beauty has long made her the subject of village gossip. Shashi believes it was this beauty that led to the baseless accusations about her character. When he discovers that Sen Didi is suffering from smallpox바카라a condition Jamini fails to diagnose바카라he steps in to treat her. However, Shashi soon realises that Sen Didi is more anxious about reclaiming her beauty than regaining her health. Though she recovers, the disease leaves one of her eyes permanently damaged. In the end, her beauty바카라the very thing that once defined her in the eyes of others바카라is lost.

The third and most enchanting presence is Kusum, Paran바카라s wife, who remains childless at 23. Labelled infertile by societal standards, Kusum refuses to let this stigma dampen her spirit. She playfully engages with Shashi, who seems captivated by her charm. Yet, his attention also lingers on Kusum바카라s sister-in-law, Moti (Surangana Bandyopadhyay), whose pending marriage is a matter of concern in the household. Shashi is keen to check Moti바카라s heartbeat with his stethoscope, even as he invites Kusum to feel his own during their secret rendezvous beneath the quiet palm groves.

Naive and innocent, Moti adores Shashi, while Kusum바카라playful but perceptive바카라tries to draw closer to him with her spirited friendliness. Beneath the surface, Kusum feels a sting of jealousy toward Moti바카라s youth and the affection Shashi shows her. This emotional tension unfolds beautifully in a scene by the pond, where the two women get into a scuffle, each vying for Shashi바카라s attention.

Putul Nacher Itikatha Still
Putul Nacher Itikatha Still Photo: Debarati Gupta
info_icon

Amidst all this, Shashi바카라rooted in modern science바카라navigates the feudal rhythms of early twentieth-century village life. Into this world arrives his old college friend Kumud (Parambrata Chattopadhyay), now a Yatra troupe lead actor. Kumud charms the villagers, wins Moti바카라s heart, and soon expresses his desire to marry her. He urges Shashi to introduce him to Moti바카라s family. Though hesitant at first, Shashi eventually agrees, cleverly manipulated by Kusum.

Certain of Moti바카라s fate with Kumud, Kusum tries to lure Shashi one night as he walks through the palm grove. It is then that a somewhat unsettled Shashi delivers one of the most widely quoted lines of Bengali literature: 바카라Shorir, shorir!바카라Tomar바카라mon바카라nai, Kusum?바카라바카라a question that still fascinates us whenever we try to understand바카라or misunderstand바카라love; whenever love is tested against desire.

Moti leaves the village after her marriage; Sen바카라Didi fits an artificial glass eye; and Jadab바카라Pandit, eager to rebuke Shashi바카라s modernism, claims he can predict his death. When word spreads바카라sparked by Shashi바카라s casual remark바카라the entire village prepares to celebrate Jadab바카라s chosen date as though it were a public spectacle.

Despite Shashi바카라s pleas, Jadab and his wife die before the assembled villagers. To the crowd, it seems miraculous, but Shashi knows it is a planned suicide.

At last, Shashi learns that Kusum is leaving with her family. He pleads with her to rekindle their affair, but she refuses. The final blow comes when he discovers that Jadab바카라who had spent his life opposing Western medicine바카라has willed his entire fortune to establish a hospital, on the condition that Shashi will run it. Shashi, who had spent his student years dreaming of going abroad, remains in Gaodiya, tethering his future to the village that both embraced and resisted him.

A few images from the film haunt you for a long time. In the beginning, when Shashi is about to discover the first dead body amid a thunderstorm, cinematographer Sayak Bhattacharya바카라s camera begins its slow approach toward a lightning-struck tree. The branches seem to pierce through your eyes바카라one is momentarily unsure whether one is seeing branches or roots. The lightning had struck the tree in such a way that the branches appeared to grow downward, like roots.

Later, Shashi sits in a boat with Haru바카라s dead body lying before him. A few fireflies gather around him in the dark바카라the kind of deep, textured darkness that only villages in Bengal experience, under a sky heavy with melancholic, clouded blue. The way Bhattacharya frames this moment feels as though he perceives these nights of his native land through all his senses. When a firefly, caught in Shashi바카라s pocket, blinks with its single drop of light, one senses the fire waiting to touch Haru바카라s body바카라and the many other bodies Dr. Shashi will encounter as the narrative unfolds.

Some of these visuals, ideated by Mukhopadhyay, stir thoughts that wander beyond Manik Bandyopadhyay바카라s original story, yet stay faithful to its essence. One moment in particular lingers: Sen Didi making love to Shashi바카라s father. Her false glass eye stays eerily open throughout the act, staring just off the corner of the camera lens, evoking a subtle yet persistent discomfort. The act is so starkly physical, it seems to mock Shashi바카라s exasperated question바카라바카라Body, body! Don바카라t you have a mind, Kusum?!바카라

This is also where Tinni Mitra바카라s editing must be mentioned. She makes a striking choice to cut away from the characters during the exchange between Shashi and Kusum. Instead, she places the lines over the image of the moon바카라s reflection on a pond, half veiled by the silhouette of a palm tree. The effect is both poetic and disorienting, mirroring the scene바카라s submerged tensions without directly confronting them. Prabuddha Banerjee바카라s score feels rooted in both the film바카라s geo-cultural atmosphere and emotional landscape. 

Actors like Dhritiman Chatterjee, Abir Chatterjee, and, in a brief role, Parambrata Chatterjee, do justice to their characters. Ananya Chatterjee brings the right mix of sensuality and helplessness to the middle-aged Sen Didi, while Surangana Bandyopadhyay appears fresh and endearing as Moti. But it is Jaya Ahsan who stands out as Kusum. Through her, one truly witnesses the real Kusum, with all her yearning, desperation, playful lies, vulnerability, and agency.

Interestingly, Mukhopadhyay adds a thought-provoking layer to the novel by shifting the narrative's temporal setting from 1935-36 to 1941-42, placing Putul Nacher Itikatha against the backdrop of the Second World War. This change locates the story at a time when Bengal was on the verge of experiencing one of the most infamous famines in Indian history. When asked about this shift, Mukhopadhyay explained that he wanted to create a stark contrast with the stagnation of life in Gaodiya village. He took this fictional leap by altering the timeline, keeping two historical events in mind: the Japanese bombing of Kolkata in 1942-43 and the devastating famine that followed the war. As Mukhopadhyay put it, Putul Nacher Itikatha ends where Satyajit Ray바카라s Ashani Sanket (1973) (written by Bibhuti Bhushan Bandyopadhyay) begins.

In my view, the warplane that crashes and sinks into the river towards the end of the film is a poignant metaphor that brings Mukhopadhyay바카라s version of The Puppet바카라s Tale full circle. The fire hinted at earlier, when a firefly was caught in Shashi바카라s pocket바카라a lyrical yet piercing motif바카라finds its exaggerated counterpart in the flames of the crashed plane, symbolising the massive loss of life that Doctor Shashi cannot possibly combat.

Debarati Gupta is a Filmmaker, Columnist & Guest Lecturer at Calcutta University

×