The West Bengal elections have ignited popular interest in the social dimensions of politics. Although the TMC has retained power in the state, the meteoric rise of the BJP from three seats in 2016 to a whopping 77 has excited obsÂervers across the political spectrum. It has increased its voteshare from 10 per cent to 38 per cent within a span of five years. In explaining the rise of the BJP, some commentators highlight the role of welfare transfers. Others lament the introduction of identity politics. Commentaries on the crisis in the state바카라s 바카라party society바카라, the changing contours of bhadralok politics and the emergence of 바카라subaltern Hindutva바카라 abound. However, the prolific discussions on the growing support for the BJP, especially among the oppressed castes, have ignored a key component of their politics: the role of political ideas.
ALSO READ:
Oppressed people, like everyone else, harbour political ideas about what kind of society they want to live in and how to get there. In West Bengal, conversations with them, in both rural and urban areas, inevitably turn to themes such as shoshan (expÂloitation), anyay (injustice) and atyÂachar (oppression): such themes cut across caste, gender and religious divisions. They identify themselves as goribmanush (poor people) who are poor not because of past karma or kismet but becÂause the borolok (big people) have cornered resources and refuse to share it with others. As a Santhal woman in Maldah바카라s Tudtudiya hamlet told me when I interviewed her for my book on the politics of the poor, 바카라Jaar mathaye joto tel, sheye aaro beshi paye바카라 (those who have more, get even more).
Trickledown democracy
In postcolonial democracies such as ours, political parties have mobilised votes in the name of the poor. As a consequence, the poor themselves바카라many of whom are from Dalit, Adivasi, OBC and Muslim backgrounds바카라have appropriated ideas of justice, equality and dignity. They support political parties that take seriously the idea of dignity.
ALSO READ:
The quest for dignity often brings the oppressed in conflict with the elites. Demanding dignity involves renegotiating status, which is inherently a zero-sum game. However, because oppressed people depend on the elites for employment, goodwill and sheer survival, they cannot affÂord whole-scale class conflict to liquidate their antagonists. Rather, the ensuing conflict is 바카라agonistic바카라바카라in which the different sides seek to recÂonfigure power relations rather than annihilate each other. West Bengal today is seeing an intensification of this 바카라agonistic바카라 politics between the oppressed and the elites.
Interestingly, the BJP has successfully portrayed itself as the party that offers dignity to the oppressed while casting the TMC as the party of the elites. Indeed, if the CSDS post-poll analysis after the 2019 Lok Sabha elections is to be believed, support for the BJP among Dalits, Adivasis and OBCs바카라who comprise the bulk of poor people in the state바카라more than doubled between 2014 and 2019. The 2021 post-poll survey suggests that support for the BJP among such demographics as Dalit men, Adivasi men and OBC women was much higher than among their elite caste counterparts.
ALSO READ:
How did the BJP do this? Because the idea of a monolithic Hindu rashtra would prima facie seem to promise equality, respect and dignity to members of communities who continue to be discriminated against as 바카라low caste바카라 and 바카라untouchable바카라. Arguably, this has been the party바카라s strategy elsewhere: research I conducted in Ahmedabad with the Cambridge sociologist Manali Desai illustrates the ways in which Dalits and Adivasis in that city perceive the BJP, more than any other party, to have offered them respect and recognition as equal members of society. Oppressed people vote for the BJP not becÂause they are brainwashed. Instead, their vote for the party is motivated by their quest for dignity, which they believe the BJP바카라rather than any other바카라is best placed to confer.
Ideas vs identity politics
Although similar, the BJP바카라s strategy in West Bengal has a twist to it. As several researchers have documented, caste discrimination has been a blind spot for the Left Front which ruled the State for 34 years바카라theoretically never articulated, and always subsumed under the category of 바카라class바카라. The TMC, by contrast, actively recognised caste as a crucial factor in socÂial life by extending 17 per cent reservations for the state바카라s OBC communities. Long before PM Modi바카라s recent antics at Oraknadi, Mamata Banerjee sought, and becÂame, a lifelong member of the Matua Mahasangh, signalling her commitment to redressing the demÂands of recognition sought by members of the Matua community, historically stigmatised as 바카라untÂouchable바카라. Indeed, Mamata battered the bhadralok bias of West Bengal바카라s political elites. However, the TMC refrained from entrenching a conflictual politics focused on redressing caste oppression in the state. That was a major limitation, since conflict is inescapable in democratic life, especially in the context of hierarchical socÂial relations. Filling this void, the BJP has successfully displaced the incÂhoate but simmering conflict betÂween the oppressed castes and elite castes onto other cleavages바카라namely, Hindu vs Muslim, citizen vs illegal migÂrant, and Indian vs Bangladeshi.
The BJP has not brainwashed West Bengal바카라s oppressed castes into supporting the Hindutva ideology. Nor has it attracted them by delivering welfare more effectively than the TMC (it hasn바카라t). It is also not the case that the state바카라s oppressed people are inherently anti-Muslim. Rather, the growing support for the party is motivated by the demand for dignity among the historically oppressed castes. Indeed, as an analysis by the Trivedi Centre for Political Data shows, almost half of all BJP MLAs are Dalit. The contrast with the TMC, where less than a quarter of MLAs are from oppÂressed caste backgrounds, cannot be starker. Consider Dilip Ghosh, the president of the state unit of the BJP. He is from the Sadgop community, listed as OBC in West Bengal. This is significant in a state where no politician from outside the elite caste club has come close to power, despite Dalits and OBCs together accÂounting for almost 60 per cent of the state바카라s population. The BJP has enhÂanced political representation of Dalits in its party, responding to Dalits바카라 demand for dignity in a state where they have long faced political marginalisation. This is a lesson the TMC ignores at its own peril: the party will hurtle into oblivion if it does not meet the demands for dignity expressed by oppressed castes in West Bengal. The reason, though simple, is often less than obvious to analysts: oppressed people take polÂitical ideas seriously. It is time that analysts of their politics, and those who do politics in their name, did so as well.
The author is senior lecturer, Global Development Politics, at the University of York. He is the author of The Politics of the Poor: Negotiating Democracy in Contemporary India
(Views are personal)
