Medical reality has moved on to a host of new possibilities today that give us cause for optimism in the face of what, for long, was sure, painful death. Beckoning on the frontier are not just qualitatively new treatment options for the killer disease, but early detection of vulnerability itself.
At the heart of these advancements is a better understanding of cancers at the molecular level. Doctors now look at cancer as a disease of the genes, not of the affected organs. Our genes need to be decoded daily for us to function. Sometimes, there is a 바카라misfeeding바카라 and a wrong code gets generated, causing cells to divide uncontrollably. That바카라s what we call cancer.
Now, the good news. Cutting-edge recent advancements, such as immuno-oncology and the discovery of at least 50 new drugs, have now enabled what doctors call 바카라targeted therapies바카라. Enthusiasts say it바카라s the closest thing to a cure. Some targeted therapies are, in fact, sharp-focused enough to attack only cancer cells, sparing the body of dangerous side-effects바카라as was entailed in the most bankable option till now: chemotherapy. Indian doctors aren바카라t shying away from trying out the new means, though few patients can afford the costs at this point in time. Yet, one thing is clear: the fight against cancer is getting smarter than we think.
A targeted therapy isn바카라t concerned with where the tumour is located, but what kind of a mutation of genes or markers has caused it. A genetic marker is a gene within a chromosome whose location has been identified. This isn바카라t just a shift to a higher degree of micro-level subtlety, and hence to a more fine-grained picture, but also to a view along a different paradigm in understanding the causative linkages of a disease that바카라s still essentially a mystery.
The invention of Gleevac in 2001 was a milestone. Acting directly on the errant protein, it raised the survival rates of people beyond five years of being diagnosed with a specific form of leukemia up to 90 per cent from a third. And now, gene-targeting drugs are slowly taking over the fight. This June, results from studies on the first 50 patients receiving a drug called larotrectinib were announced at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a mega event. After 12 months since they got started on the therapy, 60 per cent, or 30 of these 50 patients, had no signs of their cancer coming back. They are, of course, still being watched. The drug acts on a particular mutation in a gene called the tropomyosin receptor kinase gene.
For Indian oncologists, the mainstay of cancer treatment has for long been an indiscriminate regimen of chemotherapy (cell-destroying drugs) and radiation바카라they were akin to resorting to a scorched-earth policy on the whole body, for want of more fine-tuned means. But even after the technology became available, set diagnosis preferences were such that it was rare for a doctor to order a genetic test, for instance, to precisely locate a protein that had been wrongly programmed by a rogue copy of a gene to instruct cells to multiply uncontrollably. The focus was not on what was going on at a molecular level바카라in other words, its cause.
In fact, doctors always knew cancer was the result of mutations of specific genes. Yet, the orthodox approach was to inflict good amounts of drugs and radiation in the hope that these would work. Partly because genetics itself was poorly understood바카라as a frontier science, it still is, to a large extent바카라and also because there weren바카라t too many applications available that would provide required results. So, the fight was like a blindfolded soldier firing randomly, when what was needed was a sharp, sniper shot.


Nandal survived advanced ovarian cancer, which had developed resistance to chemotherapy. After a genetic test revealed a mutation in the BRCA2 gene, she was given a PARP inhibitor drug. She is responding well and says a 바카라positive mind바카라 also helped her carry through.
The results could be disastrous because the treatment wasn바카라t바카라in most cases바카라even meant to work on the offending gene. In a scenario where there could be hundreds of unique faults, each with its own weakness바카라which, once identified, could be directly targeted바카라a broad-sweep fusillade will by definition have a much lower level of success. And this isn바카라t just a theoretical point: targeted therapies are indeed demonstrably improving survival, causing cancer to go into remission for longer periods.
Take Delhi schoolteacher and AIR singer Meena Nandal. She thought her 바카라slight바카라 pain was the result of some 바카라stomach problem바카라, probably stress from being proactive with kids at school. Until she was told, in December 2011, that she had stage three ovarian cancer. The world seemed to stop for her. Initially, the chemotherapy and radiation seemed to work. 바카라I was free of cancer for about 18 months until it came back.바카라 The treatment was restarted, but this time, it wasn바카라t working.
That바카라s when her doctor at Delhi바카라s B.L. Kapoor Memorial, Amit Aggarwal, decided to order a genetic test to try and see why the cancer cells were able to dodge his treatment. A sample was taken by the Bangalore-based Strand Life Sciences Ltd, one of the many new entities with the required technical capability. The results were illuminating. Her cancer was traced to a mutation in the BRCA2 gene바카라the same gene that causes breast cancer. However, the mutation was provisionally categorised as a 바카라variant of unknown significance바카라 or VUS. That바카라s code for a mutation that has not been investigated yet. So, scientists at Strand Life Sciences decided to test her extended family.
A series of investigations and computer modelling showed there was no reason besides this VUS that could have caused her condition. Worse, it ran in her family. Her younger sister, a breast cancer survivor, carried the same BRCA2 gene mutation. So was her brother. In such cases, the patient tends to be resistant to chemotherapy, and current guidelines recommend a drug called PARP inhibitor. Thanks to the gene test, Nandal began responding to the targeted therapy and is currently in remission.
According to a recent epidemiology paper in The Lancet, nearly 1 million new cases of cancer are being diagnosed in India every year. This is still low compared to cancer rates in the West바카라adjusted for age, for instance, India바카라s combined male and female incidence is about a quarter of that of Europe. Yet, the mortality burden is similar to that of high-income countries. Between 6-7 lakh people died of cancer in India in 2012, according to the study. 바카라Such figures are partly indicative of low rates of early-stage detection and poor treatment outcomes,바카라 says Prof Mohandas K. Mallath of the Tata Medical Centre, Calcutta, who led the study.
As cancer becomes surprisingly common, Indians are scrambling to cope with and prepare for it. Last summer, Nirmal Kaur sat waiting outside her doctor바카라s office for what seemed like a verdict on her life. Having seen her mother and aunt struggle to beat breast cancer the past two years, she finally decided to find out if she carried the cancer-causing gene herself. Kaur바카라s test showed she had a 65 per cent chance of contracting breast cancer. 바카라I am better prepared and my doctors have put me on a bi-annual screening regimen,바카라 she says.
The advance is along two flanks. First, as genetic mapping techniques become more easily available in the country, it바카라s becoming easier to predict the vulnerability quotient of individuals to incurable diseases, such as cancer and Alzheimer바카라s, as in Kaur바카라s case. The idea here is to catch such diseases early so that they can be treated. At the same time, deeper and richer data on Indian genes has itself thrown up new understanding unique to the country. For instance, 30 per cent of Indian breast or ovarian cancers have been found to be hereditary. 바카라That바카라s three times more than the incidence in the West,바카라 says Dr Vijay Chandru, chairman of Strand Life Sciences.
Beyond general truths, studies of Indian mutation patterns are also helping create institutional knowledge specific to Indian ethnicities and demography, which enable further customisation of treatment. In Indians, for instance, most breast cancers are caused by a preponderance of faults in the BRCA1 gene, while in the West, it is equally caused by both BRCA1 and 2, says Dr Chandru.
But inheritance too is more than a randomly occurring thing: certain ethnicities have a higher susceptibility. It now seems Konkani, Gujarati and Maharashtrian women are more prone, so it바카라s possible for doctors to decide which women need not undergo radiotherapy. 바카라The BRCA gene happened to be the hotspot test earlier too. But it was too expensive to look at the whole gene, so you would only look for specific markers tested in western women. People assumed the same would be true for Indian women, so they were probably missing a whole lot of cases,바카라 adds Dr Chandru.
The other big advancement is in immunotherapy. In a sense, it바카라s a way of tricking our immune system, which normally fights infections, to also fight cancer. Our T-cells바카라which are like soldiers patrolling the frontline바카라successfully defend us from daily infections because they can recognise intruders like viruses and other pathogens. But cancer cells produce a protein which prevents T-cells from recognising them as enemies. Immunotherapy drugs make T-cells turn on cancer cells too and, in some cases, they have wiped cancers out.


In 2013, Angelina Jolie underwent a preventive double mastectomy바카라removal of both breasts바카라after a genetic test showed she carried a faulty BRCA1 gene. Jolie also had her ovaries and fallopian tubes removed. She had an 87 per cent risk of breast cancer and a 50 per cent risk of ovarian cancer. 바카라Cancer is still a word that strikes fear into people바카라s hearts, producing a deep sense of powerlessness. But today it is possible to find out through a blood test whether you are highly susceptible to breast and ovarian cancer, and then take action,바카라 Jolie later wrote in The New York Times.
Yet, experienced oncologists have a word of caution. Many promising discoveries have only led to replapses, sometimes after years. 바카라I have used immunotherapy on three patients and it has worked very well in two,바카라 says Dr Harit Chaturvedi, chairman, cancer care, Max Hospitals. He warns against getting carried away and thinking of these as magic bullets. 바카라I personally feel we should be open to these advancements, but 95 per cent of cancers are still treated the traditional way in India,바카라 he says. Why? For one, genetic tests may at this stage add value to only 2-3 per cent of the cases, he says. Immunotherapy, for instance, has no role yet in head and neck cancer. Costs are also a prohibitive factor, though with some heartening variations. When it comes to new therapies, few people can afford many of these. 바카라If immunotherapy works, a patient will need it all his life. The costs work out to at least Rs 1-1.5 lakh a month,바카라 Dr Chaturvedi says.
At the preventive level, technological advancements mean genetic tests are getting cost-effective and you could get a basic profile done for Rs 25,000. Firms such as Dhitionomics Technologies, Map My Genes and BabyShield offer off-the-shelf products. The first step, though, is seeing a genetic counsellor.
In totality, India is pushing the scientific frontiers. Indian scientists took the first steps in understanding genetics in 1997, under the International Human Genome Project. Dr Samir Brahmachari, former director of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and founder of the Institute of Genomic and Integrative Biology (IGIB), headed the project. He says the aim was to 바카라accumulate and use information from genetic mapping of people in the country for diagnosis, prevention and therapy of genetic disorders in India바카라. In 2008, the Indian Genome Variation Consortium helped scientists study how genetic variations occur based on geography and demography. 바카라The idea was to have baseline data that all genetic scientists could refer to,바카라 Dr Brahmachari tells Outlook. 바카라Genetic diseases are seen as mutations in your genome structure. But just one simple mutation doesn바카라t make the disease; it바카라s a combination of mutations. These combinations are what we were trying to record.바카라 The project also included mapping 100 people who lived up to 97 years of age and are healthy.
Establishing the probability of getting diseases could have significant impacts on survival chances, says Dr Ramananda Srikantiah Nadig, head of the clinical advisory board at Healthi. 바카라Just because you have a family history of the disease doesn바카라t mean you have it. Genetic mapping helps figure out if you might be susceptible and help take the necessary precautions you need to fight the disease as early as possible.바카라
But the biggest benefit is still for those already battling cancer, who can now know if a certain drug will be helpful. Institutional efforts are now geared towards having a common platform into which all knowledge unique to Indian patients are fed. For instance, the IGIB and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences run the Go Med project, where doctors, in order to treat patients better, can forward a patient바카라s general and genetic history. 바카라We have a web interface where doctors can add, get feedback on and consult patient history,바카라 says Dr Muhammad Faruq, the scientist heading the project. It has a dual purpose: building a database and integrating genetics into regular treatment. The Go Med project has been working on numerous diseases, including cancer, to find new hotspot regions in the genetic architecture of people.
The big question: why isn바카라t there a cure for cancer yet? The answer is not straightforward, but offers a new layer of optimism. 바카라Even if we can make cancer somewhat like what AIDS is today, it will be a milestone. In other words, make cancer manageable and survivable, until it바카라s made curable. Nobody dies of AIDS anymore,바카라 Dr Chandru says.
By Zia Haq and Arushi Bedi