바카라œEvery city has a sex and an age which have nothing to do with demography. Rome is feminine. So is Odessa. London is a teenager, an urchin, and in this hasn바카라™t changed since the time of Dickens. Paris, I believe, is a man in his twenties in love with an older woman.바카라
바카라”John Berger
It바카라™s been said that poetry has the potential to ferment revolution. Since the Covid pandemic, there has been a lot of conversation about the arts as an essential commodity. 바카라˜바카라˜Poetry Pharmacies바카라™바카라™ exist, and seemingly bridge the gap between art and therapy. In a post-truth universe, where social media has the potential to curate anxiety, and rewire news as an intimate catastrophe, writing, more than ever, is a metaphor for political activity. Nothing is private or personal anymore. The communities that coalesce around art for its potential to liberate the individual from oppressive social realities, show us a way to regulate and diagnose the emotional temperature of a place바카라”a city, perhaps?
Berger바카라™s utterance that reformulates the city as a 바카라˜바카라˜character바카라™바카라™ keeps surfacing on social media once every couple of years or so. It바카라™s become a popular template to think about inhabitants of cities as affective barometers that both make and unmake their burgeoning material infrastructures. The sociologist Louis Wirth, building on Georg Simmel바카라™s notions of the 바카라œmetropolis바카라, argued that urbanism embodied a distinct form of 바카라˜바카라˜group life바카라™바카라™, suggesting even that these forms could exist outside of 바카라˜바카라˜cities바카라™바카라™ as we see them in modernity. We are speaking here about a 바카라˜바카라˜spirit바카라™바카라™, a skein of relationality and association that has emerged in modern metropolitan centres, as distinct from other forms of living. Perhaps, the most imaginative documentation and assessment of this 바카라˜바카라˜spirit바카라™바카라™ comes to us, not from the historians or the journalists, but the poets and artists of a city.
The Bombay Poets were a group of writers who embodied novel modes of creative collaboration in the city through their practice. They바카라™ve often been likened to the French Impressionists, who gathered at cafes and created magic with their artwork. Literary critic Anjali Nerlekar argues that they were at their peak during the 60s (sathothari) and the 70s, resisting and reworking publishing practices for a cultural sphere that was learning to cope with modern technologies of representation. They were a group of mostly Indian-English writers who, through their rejection of 바카라œhigh바카라 poetic forms and eschewing of the anarchist and communist politics of the Beats and the Black Panthers, the radical defiance of the Bhakti poets and other important social and artistic movements, birthed a unique idiom to understand and interpret the city. Mythologies, like histories, gain currency through their heroes, and among the various creative individuals from the group, it was Arun Kolatkar, the 바카라˜바카라˜vanishing바카라™바카라™ poet, whose work has arguably drawn the most criticism바카라”both positive and negative. The Marathi poet, Dilip Chitre, laments the loss suffered by the Marathi literary establishment because of its ignorance of Kolatkar바카라™s Marathi oeuvre, equating it with a kind of amnesia or 바카라œblindness바카라. Many Marathi commentators refuse to elevate Kolatkar바카라™s Marathi writing to the level of 바카라œpoetry바카라. (In a conversation with me a few months ago, a senior Marathi poet disdained him by calling him little more than a 바카라œcopywriter바카라).


Considering the cottage industries of criticism that have emerged around his English writings, it would not be hyperbole to claim that Kolatkar was ahead of his time. But even he had his heroes, and his own conception of a 바카라œtradition바카라 from which he was drawing. His influences have been recounted by many commentators, but we are interested in a particular figure from Marathi literature whose work hasn바카라™t been explored much in the context of the English Bombay Poets. There is a clue in a poem from his 바카라œurban바카라 poetry cycle바카라”Kala Ghoda Poems. This collection surfaces regularly in literary festivals and artistic events in Mumbai, and other cosmopolitan contexts elsewhere. It would be impossible to think of Kala Ghoda, the thriving commercial and cultural hub (바카라œart quarters바카라) without remembering the famous characters and their material surroundings in the poetry cycle. These include Ugh the 바카라˜바카라˜Pi dog바카라™바카라™, who draws his lineage to the loyal canine that followed Yudhishtira up till the point of death, in the Mahabharata, the 바카라œOgress바카라 and the 바카라œBarefoot Queen of the Crossroads바카라.
This is a short extract from Kolatkar바카라™s poems featuring the old Wayside Inn, written in the voice of a wall of the legendary cafe where these poets met regularly. In Kolatkar바카라™s poetic metaverse, material objects were often charged with emotional histories and summoned as sensitive witnesses:
바카라œIt remembers Babasaheb sitting all by himself
with a pot of tea and scribbling notes,
dreaming with an audacious pencil
of a society undivided by caste and creed
It remembers an obscure poet munching on Welsh rabbit,
and thinking of rats dying in a wet barrel.바카라
(From 바카라˜The Rat-poison Man바카라™s Lunch Hour바카라™, Kala Ghoda Poems)
In these lines, two diverse figures are brought together on the city streets바카라”Dr B.R. Ambedkar, the revolutionary anti-caste theorist and social reformer, and B.S. Mardhekar, the popular Marathi modernist poet바카라”a writer whose style was characterised as durbodh (obscure). Kolatkar chooses to tie together these diverse figures through the everyday activity of writing at a cafe. This gesture is metonymic in its suggestion of literary and political activity, convened by the material architecture of the city바카라”a poster for rat-poison that leans on a cafe wall. Two distinct poetic styles emerge from this articulation: the poetry of sensitive witness바카라”of observation and attention바카라”and the poetry of experience, where the body itself becomes the locus of witnessing.
in arun Kolatkar바카라™s Kala Ghoda Poems, he allows the city to become a character through sensory vignettes, using metaphor and dialogue to balance the inevitable voyeuristic gaze.
Aniket Jaaware speaks of Baburao Bagul바카라™s writings as 바카라œdestitute바카라 literature, rather than Dalit literature, while writing into the second category. While Ambedkar is not known as a poet, he used metaphor to deepen his arguments for social justice. His own experiences became the basis for an anger that drew on, and amplified, public emotions. Whether it was his description of Hinduism as a 바카라œchamber of horrors바카라, or his urgency in asking the sensitive reader to join him in the 바카라œtrenches바카라 while speaking of the historic battle for dignity, his 바카라œaudacious pencil바카라 brought home the experience of caste in a vivid, corporeal idiom. Dalit poets wrote in this idiom in Marathi, perhaps channelling Phule바카라™s compelling style of polemic, more than Ambedkar. Anger became the whetstone to Namdeo Dhasal바카라™s poetry. This is how he opens a poem on Kamatipura, for instance:
The nocturnal porcupine reclines here
Like an alluring grey bouquet
Wearing the syphilitic sores of centuries
Pushing the calendar away
Forever lost in its own dreams
(Translated by Dilip Chitre)
In Prakash Jadhav바카라™s 바카라˜Dadar Pulakhali바카라™ (immortalised as 바카라˜Under Dadar Bridge바카라™ in Night of Prophecy, Amar Kanwar바카라™s documentary on poetry and songs of resistance), a micro-history of the city is written on the body of the persona, and his mother바카라”a sex worker: 바카라œtake my clothes off/strip me/have a good look/at the tomb that/was broken open/ to pull you out.바카라 (Translated from the film바카라™s subtitles). The imagery of death and humiliation ruptures the poet바카라™s experience of life in Mumbai Shehar.
Kolatkar바카라™s Kala Ghoda Poems is, however, written in the first, not the second, poetic voice. In these poems, he allows the city to become a character through sensory vignettes, using metaphor and dialogue to balance the inevitable voyeuristic gaze. B.S. Mardhekar바카라™s poem 바카라˜Pipaat Mele Olya Undeer바카라™, which he casually refers to here, is arguably the first real 바카라˜decadent바카라™, 바카라˜urban바카라™ poem in Modern Marathi Poetry.
In Barrels Wet Rats Died
Necks fell, without strangulation
On Lips, lips met
Necks fell, without desire
Poor, helpless, lived in ratholes
In barrels, died, hiccupping
Day spilled, in ash-grey eyes
Limbs and private parts washed clean
To live is a compulsion
To die is a compulsion
Sorrow has poisonous eyes,
but of glass
Honeyed honeycomb
set on lips
like Bakelite!
On lips, lips touch
In barrels, rats bathed.
(This translation is mine. Have attempted to preserve the cadences of the original Marathi)
The publication of this poem, in 1946, in the Marathi literary magazine, Abhiruchi, acquired the status of a 바카라œliterary event바카라. It heralded a new kind of writing, perhaps unwittingly serving as a critique of the lofty imaginations of an independent India. It quickly entered schoolchildren바카라™s Marathi textbooks. Most Marathi speakers belt out the title 바카라˜Pipaat Mele Olya Undeer바카라™ without batting an eyelid when they hear Mardhekar바카라™s name. Why did this become the defining poem for an entire generation of people in Mumbai?
While Mardhekar바카라™s first collection of writing, Shishiragam, aligned more with the Ravi Kiran Mandal poets and British Romanticism, 바카라˜Pipaat...바카라™ and other poems written in this somewhat Eliotesque aesthetics of urban sensation witnessed the city in its vivid, material reality. Even at its incomprehensible best, it reads like a series of broken images that lay bare the anxieties and struggles of a people who have been thrown into uneven urban development. The images are from a special issue on the poem by Abhiruchi after close to 50 years of its first publication. M.V. Dhond바카라™s article from the same issue offers two readings of the poem: in the first reading, Dhond makes the connection between people who come to Mumbai in droves, with aspirations, every day. In the rat-like struggle (rat-race), they fight with each other and drop dead (metaphorically and literally). In the second reading, Dhond suggests that the barrels are the thekas where labourers go to drink. In both readings, Dhond reads the poem as a metaphor for alienation, exploitation of labour, urban despair, dreams and aspiration, and migration patterns.
I am reminded of Shahryar바카라™s sher sung soulfully by Suresh Wadkar in the film Gaman (1978):
바카라œà¤¸à¥€à¤¨à¥‡ में जलन आà¤à¤–ों में तूफ़ान सा कà¥à¤¯à¥‚ठहै इस शहर में हर शख़à¥à¤¸ परेशान सा कà¥à¤¯à¥‚ठहै?바카라
Is Pipaat바카라¦ not an answer to these apocryphal questions?
Mundane objects moved the vocabularies of the many Bombays the poets mapped바카라”corrupting and re-creating the 바카라œEnglish바카라, Marathi, Gujarati and Urdu into 바카라œBambaiyya바카라.
Perhaps one of the reasons that this poem became a popular symbol for the urban condition in Mumbai Shehar is the spectacular use of metaphor. The entire poem is a metaphor for 바카라˜바카라˜living바카라™바카라™ and 바카라˜바카라˜dying바카라™바카라™, and Mardhekar바카라™s pen doesn바카라™t provide any explanation even until the end, essentially opening it up to a plethora of interpretations. Who are the rats? What is the barrel? Why is it wet? Why 바카라œBakelite바카라? Without using any 바카라œemotion words바카라, completely relying on material details, Mardhekar managed to put his finger on the pulse of a people disillusioned by the promises of modern urban life. In his 바카라œcity poems바카라, there are moments of wonder at technological advancement and the 바카라œfactory바카라, but they are quickly muffled by the sounds of the siren that calls factory workers (including mill karamcharis) to work.
In an interview with the Bombay poet Eunice De Souza, Kolatkar refers to an essay by Durga Bhagwat called 바카라˜Absence of Butterflies바카라™ where she speaks about the dearth of 바카라œphysical observation and detail바카라바카라”바카라œThere are a lot of mythical birds and beasts in Indian poetry but not ordinary things바카라¦Sparrows and crows have rarely appeared in Marathi poetry but it is full of mythical Sanskrit birds, the chatak and the chator, for instance.바카라 He speaks about how English Romanticism allowed the poets to write about 바카라œbutterflies바카라 and 바카라œwaterfalls바카라. It must be acknowledged, however, that it is the urban poetry of Mardhekar, and others, that opened the door to 바카라œrats바카라 and 바카라œgarbage바카라, 바카라œrailway platforms바카라, 바카라œcalendar gods바카라, 바카라œbus tickets바카라 and even 바카라œrat-poison posters바카라.
The Bombay Poets embraced this politics of the everyday, embodied even in the paintings of Bhupen Khakhar and Sudhir Patwardhan. Mundane objects moved the vocabularies of the many different Bombays that the poets mapped바카라”corrupting and re-creating the 바카라œEnglish바카라, Marathi, Gujarati and Urdu into 바카라œBambaiyya바카라 like some effervescent contagion. In his essay, 바카라˜Death of a Poet바카라™, A.K. Mehrotra, Kolatkar바카라™s contemporary, observes how he 바카라œenchanted바카라 the 바카라œordinary바카라 through this 바카라œart by invoice바카라. The poetry became familiar, intimate and relatable, employing imagery and metaphors that flapped a lazy allegorical eye towards the Sant Kavi, Bhakti poets, and even other Modernist American or European contemporaries. The narratives fold 바카라˜바카라˜extraordinary바카라™바카라™ events into 바카라˜바카라˜ordinary바카라™바카라™ tableaus, blurring the lines between mythic, magic, and social realism.
Young poets writing of the city today draw upon the writings of Adil Jussawala, A.K. Mehrotra, Melanie Silgardo, Eunice De Souza, and others, including Kolatkar, as if they are flipping through the pages of a 바카라œBombay catalogue바카라 from yesteryear. As we search for new idioms to define our fragmented experiences, perhaps we can learn to express our realities by paying attention to our material surroundings that are often caught in different stages of decay. Perhaps this humbling gaze that departs from the chaotic certainties of our own human selves to channel objects that move in transformative ways, holds the secret to a different politics of freedom.
(Views expressed are personal)
Aranya is a poet, currently based in Delhi, a place to which he doesn바카라™t belong. He is pursuing a PhD in Social Anthropology
(This appeared in the print as 'Verses of Witnessing')