Sanatan Sanstha followers have been named in the murder cases of rationalists Narendra Dabholkar and Govind Pansare, but a lesser known story is of a PIL filed by four petitioners in the Bombay High Court in 2011 asking for a ban on the organisation for its manipulative use of hypnosis. The petitioners cite the cases of their wives, sons, daughters and other kin who suddenly left home to join the organisation and refused to return.
바카라(The) petitioners바카라state that the son, daughter, wife and some of (their) relatives 바카라(were) attracted to the activity of the trust, leaving the parents and/or바카라guardians바카라as a result of (the) hypnotism system adopted by the바카라trust and its members,바카라 says the PIL, which is being heard by the Bombay High Court. The daughters of three of the four petitioners left them to join the organisation when they were in their early twenties. The petitioners claim the head of Sanatan Sanstha, Dr Jayant Athawle, a psychiatrist, can use hypnosis techniques to get the followers to commit crimes for their goal of establishing what they call 바카라Ishwari Rajya바카라 (god바카라s kingdom).
The petitioners claim that the Sanstha uses the 바카라principles of Ericksonian hypnosis바카라. By this 바카라technique바카라, the petition reads, 바카라individual members...as well as masses in the society can be hypnotised바카라 and 바카라any person under the impression of this technique loses his prudent wisdom and work(s) only according to the direction of hypnotist.... As a result of practising this system, it is very easy to plan and commit...destructive activity.바카라 In February 2017, the Centre filed a reply to the court saying there is not enough material evidence to ban the organisation. Sanatan Sanstha has denied these allegations in the past and said that the followers have chosen to pursue the path of spirituality.
By Prachi Pinglay-Plumber in Mumbai
