Eclecticism was a guiding principle of British architecture in India, and over a century and a half, the Neo-Classical, Gothic, Palladian and Neo-Gothic styles were married, happily and unhappily, with Indian-style cupolas, verandahs, domes and kiosks. 바카라Indo-Saracenic바카라 merely subsumed such sub-types as the 바카라Hindu-Gothic바카라 and the 바카라Renaissance-Mughal바카라. When tasked to lay out a new seat of government that would adequately reflect imperial grandeur, architects Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker had a certain history to conform to. The new edifices of New Delhi, especially in the Central Vista and around, lacked the brash confidence of buildings built in the high noon of imperialism, but followed them in their blend of East and West: the circular Parliament building was inspired by Roman styles, while the dominating central dome of Rashtrapati Bhavan evolved from a Buddhist stupa; grand Mughal Gardens rested cheek-by-jowl with English rose gardens and Connaught Place was clearly modeled on Bath, with elements of a London high street. No one would dispute that the huge complex, built바카라from 1911 to 1932바카라when the imperial purpose itself was fading, was grand.
The iconic stature of the whole complex, however, was accreted over seventy years of the Indian republic, as it hosted successive governments and generations of bureaucracy. It is now considered by citizens to be as Indian as anything, synonymous with the history of our republic, a repository of national pride and majesty.
Now, nearly nine decades after New Delhi was officially inaugurated, this grandiloquence in stone and marble is set for a makeover amidst a raging pandemic and controversy. The central vista redevelopment project바카라 estimated at a whopping Rs 20,000 crores바카라covers a three-km stretch from Rashtrapati Bhavan, North Block and South Block, up to India Gate. The mega project바카라including construction of a new, triangular parliament building opposite the current one, and office buildings for all ministries along the Rajpath in lieu of the North and South Block바카라has created a furore since the Modi government set the ball rolling in September last year.
With the Central Vista Committee바카라a special advisory group for the project바카라 giving clearance to the new Parliament building on April 23, it seems that the government has no time to lose, even in the face of a severe financial meltdown caused by the outbreak. Though urban planners and activists have raised concerns over the environmental impact of the project, the Union environment ministry바카라s obliging green nod has helped the government in clearing another hurdle.
Kanchi Kohli, senior researcher at Centre for Policy Research, says that the government needs to take another look at the project in the face of the current economic and humanitarian crisis. 바카라We don바카라t need a lockdown period to discuss matters of grave public concern through video conferencing when actually the public has no say in it. The concerned ministries could have kept the matter for later or have a considered view of it,바카라 says Kohli.
The timing of the colossal project바카라which includes a new Parliament, central secretariat and new dwellings for the prime minister and the vice president, has fueled concerns among the Opposition, historians, architects and civil right activists. The project바카라s opacity, environmental and historical implications have also come under severe criticism.
Though details are still sketchy, the Centre claims that the central vista lacks amenities and services and most of the buildings have outlived their structural lives. 바카라When Parliament was built, there was no concept of air conditioners and other facilities. So these buildings need to be upgraded and need conservation,바카라 says a senior official with the Union Ministry of Housing and Urban affairs.
Historians and conservationists stress on the old principle바카라that in the battle between heritage and modernity, the heritage nature of the structures should be kept intact. Historian and convenor of INTACH, Swapna Liddle, says that rather than converting the heritage buildings into museums바카라as is the current plan바카라they should be restored. 바카라According to Delhi building bylaws and the master plan, the central vista is a notified heritage area. So, an assessment should be conducted before making any changes,바카라 says Liddle.
The government바카라s haste over the project was questioned by many when the urban affairs ministry issued a notification on March 20 in this regard. It sought to amend the land use of five plots for the revamping project, as recommended by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA).
Opposition Congress launched a scathing attack on the extravagance and the distorted priority of the government in these trying times. Its spokesperson Sanjay Jha says that the entire exercise is adapted to suit the BJP바카라s game plan of creating a new symbolism of Indianness and to destroy open public places. 바카라The economy has gone belly-up and India바카라s GDP is likely to be in negative territory this fiscal year. Why aren바카라t new buildings built in a less inhabited area and prime real estate released in Lutyens Delhi? This project should be scrapped forthwith,바카라 he says.
However, the senior urban affairs ministry official tells Outlook that fears of conservationists and historians are unfounded: the heritage buildings will not be tampered with. 바카라No heritage buildings would be compromised or destroyed. Even the heritage part of the national archives is not being touched. On the contrary, structures would be more enhanced,바카라 she says.
Historians also say that the arguments to do away with colonial heritage are uncalled for. 바카라The buildings shouldn바카라t be discredited as colonial heritage. It바카라s built with the Indian tax payers바카라 money and our people바카라s effort. It바카라s an important part of our heritage,바카라 says Liddle. The thousands of stone-cutters, masons and labourers who toiled for two decades might agree.
ALSO READ
