The Supreme Court of India reacted to the allegations of judicial overreach and criticism of judicial activities on Monday. In response to Advocate Jain's petition of imposing president rule in west bengal, the bench of Justice BR Gavai remarked, 바카라We are facing allegations of encroaching into executive바카라.
What Did Justice Gavai Say?
Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain submitted a petition regarding the imposition of president rule in West Bengal as Bengal has witnessed a huge violence during the Waqf (amendment) protest. Jain raised the matter before Justice BR Gavai, who will take over as the Chief Justice next month. Remembering the controversial remarks by some BJP leaders on the judgement of setting the timeline for the President and Governors to clear the bill, Justice Gavai said, 바카라 You want us to issue a writ of mandamus to the president to impose this? As it is, we are facing allegations of encroaching into executive. Please.바카라
SC On Bill Clearance
On April 8, for the very first time, the Supreme Court set a three month deadline for the President amnd Governors to give assent to Bills passed by the legislature for the second time. A bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan ordered that any delay beyond this period must be justified and urged state governments to coordinate with the centre in these matters. It also underlined that the President바카라s actions are subject to judicial review under Article 201 of the Indian Constitution.
The judgement was delivered amid a constitutional standoff in Tamil Nadu where the Governor RN Ravi had delayed assent of 10 bills. The Supreme Court called this 바카라illegal바카라 and 바카라arbitrary바카라 and set aside the Governor바카라s actions using special power under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution.
Criticism Of The SC Judgement
Dhankhar On SC Judgement
Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar strongly criticised this judgement by the Supreme Court saying, 바카라We can not have a situation where you direct the President of India, and on what basis?바카라 He has addressed Article 142 as a 바카라nuclear missile against democratic forces, available to the judiciary 24x7바카라. He also added, 바카라Where are we heading? What is happening in the country? We have to be extremely sensitive. We never bargained democracy for this day바카라.
Godda MP On SC's Judgement
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey alleges that the Supreme Court is responsible for inciting religious wars in the country. He said that, 바카라The Supreme Court is crossing its limits. If one has to go to the Supreme Court for everything, then Parliament and State Assemble should be shut바카라.
Nadda's Post On X
BJP chief JP Nadda posted on X 바카라These are their personal statements, but the BJP neither agrees nor supports such statements. The BJP completely rejects these statements바카라. Nadda posted this on X after the opposition parties accused that BJP is targeting judiciary.
