바카라I바카라ve had enough of the 바카라take everyone together바카라 approach in Kashmir. It will never happen,바카라 declared a anchor, mid-broadcast. The line was not off-script; it was a deliberate provocation, designed not just to stir emotions, but to set the tone. By casting doubt on the very idea of coexistence, it gave language to a sentiment the media would echo relentlessly in the hours to come바카라that the divide is too deep, the wound too permanent, and the other side too dangerous.
On April 22, 2025, the meadow of Baisaran near Pahalgam was ruptured by gunfire. At least 26 tourists were killed and 17 others injured in what has become the deadliest civilian assault in the Valley since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. While the bullets hit bodies, their reverberations hit something deeper바카라public memory, collective blame, and the delicate social fabric of a country already fraying at its religious seams.
Almost immediately, media outlets sprang into action. 바카라Breaking news바카라 and 바카라Breaking Now바카라 banners bled across TV screens. Notifications flooded phones. Yet, within hours, contradictions began to appear. Some reports named The Resistance Front (TRF), a known proxy of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), as the perpetrator. Others, including Reuters and Al Jazeera, referenced a claim by a lesser-known group calling itself Kashmir Resistance. But crucially, most of these reports noted a lack of independent verification. In a fog of grief and outrage, the question of who did it began to matter less than the question of what narrative would stick.
The one that stuck, it seems, is one of religious revenge. On social media platform X (formerly Twitter), the hashtag #WeWantRevenge began trending within hours of the attack, amassing over 20,000 posts. Many users invoked comparisons with the Israeli military actions against Palestinians on October 7, folding this attack into a broader, communalised script of 바카라Muslim perpetrators바카라 versus 바카라Hindu victims바카라. Yet, a closer examination of the hashtag바카라s ecosystem reveals that a large percentage of these posts originated from unverified or newly created accounts, many with exclusive engagement in Hindu nationalist campaigns. It was a digital dog whistle, amplified by rage and algorithm alike.
Mainstream media did little to intervene. In fact, some helped accelerate the narrative. Republic World reported during a live broadcast that the militants had local support and framed the attack as a communal hate crime, despite no confirmation from investigative agencies. No forensic details. No official comment. Just conjecture, packaged as primetime truth.
Several publications circulated a now-viral clip of a bereaved woman saying, 바카라Shayad Muslim nahi tha isliye goli maar di바카라 (바카라Maybe they shot him because he was not Muslim바카라). That line became the emotional spine of dozens of news packages, tweets, and headlines. But there was no follow-up reporting. No examination of whether the attackers indeed asked names or demanded religious identification. No corroboration from other victims or witnesses. Instead, her grief was decontextualised and weaponised, used, at face value, to frame the event as a religiously motivated massacre바카라a framing that, in Kashmir바카라s charged history, has long been used to justify extraordinary state violence.
Other media platforms doubled down., director of The Kashmir Files, who declared the incident a targeted killing바카라a framing reflected in his film that explores a fictitious 바카라Hindu Genocide바카라 in Kashmir. Times Now, meanwhile, took to X to poll its audience on whether Bollywood should sever ties with Pakistani actors.
The prefaced their debate with a headline that read 바카라바카라Hindu Carnage Live Streamed To Pak, Time To Turn Anger Into Action!바카라
This open call for violence and retaliation, deliberately plays into, and furthers existing communal tensions. A posted on X: 바카라Public execution is the only solution to deal with Jehadis targeting innocent tourists.바카라 Whereas furthered narratives from #WeWantrevenge with telecast headlines like 바카라Life taken after asking about religion... Hindustan demands revenge.바카라
It is clear that there is a sentiment of anger in the nation, one that is not entirely unfounded given the loss of civilian lives; however, what makes this moment uniquely dangerous is the way media, political rhetoric, and social media echo chambers are working in sync. Instead of centring victims or interrogating the security lapse, the focus has shifted to identity: who was killed, who did the killing, and what that means for 바카라us바카라 versus 바카라them바카라. This flattening of a complex, ongoing insurgency into a communal spectacle does not serve justice. It serves a division. 바카라Don바카라t allow them to divide us any further in the name of religious identity. Be MATURE, not RECKLESS. Time for concrete ACTION on the ground, not hollow WORDS in TV studios or on social media. Stand UNITED in grief in the face of a terrible tragedy.바카라
The ethics of these divisive headlines are not just questionable. They are corrosive. According to the Press Council of India바카라s Norms of Journalistic Conduct, journalists must avoid speculation, particularly in matters that may inflame communal tension. They are to verify before amplifying. And yet, in the race to be first, speed and sensationalism once again outpaced accuracy.
There is still no verified forensic account of who carried out the attack. The Ministry of Home Affairs has not issued a conclusive statement. And yet, public opinion has already been shaped바카라not by facts, but by the emotional manipulation of imagery and selective quotes. This is not just a product of a long-standing editorial laziness when it comes to Kashmir, but a deliberate manipulation of a moment to serve a narrative that has long been pushed.
It has chosen virality over veracity, outrage over investigation. And in doing so, it has further alienated a region already drowning in mistrust.
