The Silver Bullet바카라�s Ricochet

Economics, however, is very much still a function of politics in this country. Much of the book covers ground that has been the subject of extesnive research and discussion since PM Vajpayee바카라�s path-breaking visit and the agreement to resolve the boundary dispute politically. This gave a shot in the arm to business ties and China soon became India바카라�s largest trading partner.

Even as our exports to China increased by over 15 per cent (imports also increased marginally), ­macro-level optics continue to be shaped by the massive trade deficit바카라�we buy three times as much as we sell to China. While the problem could partly be that China does not provide easy ­access to its market, Das­gupta believes that the 바카라�Indian side has not been sufficiently creative and striving when it comes to finding markets in China.바카라� The chapter 바카라�Trading and Slipping바카라� is indeed a rather dismal saga of the causes, starting from the limited Indian trading basket (still dominated by primary goods) to the yawning cultural ignorance.

As expected, strategic and security issues are melded into the arguments. There is a longish section on 바카라�Building Infrastructure and Influence바카라�, where we come across a practical discussion on the vexed Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Dasgupta describes it as the 바카라�silver bullet바카라� that Modi 2.0 will have to decide whether to bite or not. This informative section features discussions with strategic experts who raise predictable warnings about Beijing바카라�s intentions. Dasgupta veers between discomfiture and exasperation, even as he questions whether India바카라�s resistance is 바카라�overdone바카라� and the 바카라�non-decision바카라� is a 바카라�safe bet바카라�. He rues the possi­bility of losing out on lucrative business deals and even speculates whether China바카라�s efforts at 바카라�rebranding바카라� the BRI will bring any shift in India바카라�s sovereignty concerns. Having followed this debate for some time now, it is clear to this reviewer that this problem is not going away. Meanwhile, the ground is rapidly shifting and we are facing a China that is gaining increasing clout through its BRI projects all around us바카라�we are virtually being given a fait accompli to which we have at best a reactive stance.

Dasgupta바카라�s account is replete with dos and don바카라�ts that can only come from years of experience with and observation of Chinese politicians and entrepreneurs. He has a sharp eye for detail and an acute understanding of the issues at stake. The chapter 바카라�Deal Making while Navigating Chinese Culture바카라� is testimony to that. As he writes, 바카라�It is easy to kill a deal by making a few involuntary mistakes even at the point when it is about to be completed.바카라� This could well be a primer to negotiate and 바카라�do바카라� business with China.

But Dasgupta has also interacted at length with Indians who have done (most, successfully) and are doing business with China. He manages to bring out Indian practices, apprehensions, blind spots and limitations, but the moot point is: how is thinking in India, by and large, still characterised by the belief that the gains do not outweigh the losses?

One recalls a book that had appeared in 2014, The Silk Road Rediscovered, by Gupta, Pande and Yang. It was the first effort at analysing the growing corporate linkages between India and China, and catalogued Indian companies that had figured out 바카라�how to win바카라� in China. Dasgupta바카라�s book five years later does not appear to generate any confidence that바카라�success stories, information and obvious opportunities notwithstanding바카라�the oft-made prediction that India-China economic ties will be among the 10 most important bilateral ties in the world, would materialise. He ­acknowledges the 바카라�growing restlessness in the Indian business community바카라� about missing out on opportunities. One of the opportunity costs is reflected in the question that has just started to be asked: will India become old before it becomes rich?

(Prof Alka Acharya is with Centre for East Asian Studies, SIS, JNU)