A woman has a figure, a man a physique;
A father roars in rage, a mother shrieks in
pique;
Broad-shouldered athletes throw what
dainty damsels toss,
And female bosses supervise-male bosses
boss.
Lads gulp, maids sip:
Jacks plunge, Jills dip;
Guys bark, dames snap;
Boys punch, girls slap;
Gobs swab, WAVES mop;
Braves buy, squaws shop.
A gentleman perspires, a lady merely glows;
A husband is suspicious; a wife, however,
knows.
바카라Man & Woman-The Great-Man Thoughts by William Walden
When I got out of the airport at Patna this evening, I was greeted by a woman dressed in a salwar, sweat running down her face, clutching a handbag and asking the passengers if they needed an auto.
바카라Do you need an auto?바카라
I didn바카라t, but I asked her if she had been driving an auto for a long time. Not very long, she said.
There were five of them there.
I wanted to tell her she should get pockets stitched to her kurta.
Like I do.
Large ones. It helps. There is a strange freedom in not holding a handbag, in defying the expectation of accessorising ourselves.
I have to keep reminding the tailor to put them in on both sides. He is very amused by these demands, like me wanting big pockets like how men have. Maybe even deeper. On both sides, too.
I tell him I don바카라t want to carry a handbag.
It is a political act. Two journalists, Jan Diehn and Amber Thomas, researched the modern-day differences between men and women바카라s pockets in their article, Someone Clever Once Said Women Weren바카라t Allowed Pockets, for the online publication The Pudding.
The sizes of pockets in skinny jeans for women were 48 per cent shorter and 6.5 per cent narrower than men바카라s skinny jeans of the same size, and in straight jeans for men and women of the same size, women바카라s pockets were 46 per cent shorter and 10 per cent narrower than men바카라s straight jeans pockets, they observed.
Our phones are of the same size. Our money, too. Our ID cards are of the same proportion.
For a long time, women weren바카라t allowed to have pockets, a signifier of traditional gender roles that have repeatedly surfaced and vanished in women바카라s fashion. Fashion바카라s insistence on form and shape and decoration also point to a real connection between oppression and fashion and capitalism. Pockets in women바카라s clothing might make the appearance bulgy, so they said. They had hips and breasts. Pockets would interfere with the form and shape. Enter handbags. An opportunity. Like jewellery, handbags became accessories for class and caste, too.
During the French Revolution, pockets were banned in women바카라s clothing because the French government suspected women would conceal 바카라revolutionary materials바카라 in their pockets.
Therefore, pockets are not trivial. They are deeply liberating. They represent defiance against gender roles.
The hyperfeminised women바카라s styles kept making a comeback. With the beauty industry preying on women바카라s insecurities, decorating oneself became almost a necessary aspiration.
In 1954, Christian Dior famously stated, 바카라Men have pockets to keep things in, women for decoration.바카라
But women have always fought back. Sunita, who works as a cook in our home in Patna, has never carried a handbag. She tucks her money and phone into her blouse. Her revolutionary material is contained on her being. She lost her husband shortly after she got married. She had two little children then and remarriage wasn바카라t an option. She worked hard and has finally built her own house on her own terms.
All work could be categorised as non-traditional for women. They have been forever only expected to take care of the household. And each time, a woman has ventured out into the world, she has had to fight to exist, to flourish and to be. They have been confined to their own category with a prefix 바카라women바카라, like 바카라women filmmakers, women directors, women drivers, etc바카라.
Consider the fight for a humble pocket. It carries the universe. For us.
As an editor, there바카라s always that contempt that one has to deal with. Newsrooms are unkind places for women journalists, like the world in general. You are to listen, to comply and if you don바카라t, you are called a slave-driver, a fool, a non-person for men and even some women who have yet not realised that even pockets were denied to our kind. There are too many expectations from us. Expectations that are oppressive. We must shake them off. Like handbags.
This issue is for us. For women who work.
Let바카라s raise a toast to the pocket in women바카라s clothing then. For women who smash expectations and gender roles.
A pocket is non-negotiable.
Bigger, the better. To hold everything that we are.
Chinki Sinha is editor, outlook Magazine
(This article is a part of Outlook's March 11, 2025 Women's Day special issue 'Women at Work', which explores the experiences of women in roles traditionally occupied by men. It appeared in print as 'A Pocket Of Resistance바카라)
