From the time India was scissored into its present shape out of a larger piece of brown parchment, the question has lingered: how exactly do we orient ourselves to what surrounds us? There were no easy answers. On the flanks were parts that were formerly India, severed by amputation; on the north was an indistinct set of fluid dotted lines cutting across icy swathes, where human populations and oxygen levels both dipped to nearly zero. Four major wars in the first quarter-century after freedom marked a legacy of flux: diplomacy had to forge its subtle tools in this fire. One possible diplomatic answer to that question came from a man whose natural instincts harked back to a pre-split state of unity. Not a surprise, for Inder Kumar Gujral (b: 1919) had lived through the Partition, and carried a strong residue of old Lahore inside him바카라along with the diction.
Through the decades, when he was ordinarily resident in Lutyens바카라 Delhi, with his capital at IIC, even Gujral would not have imagined himself as the one on whom would fall the chance to deliver the 50th anniversary I-day address from Red Fort. The experiment with history was short-lived, but his 11-month stint as India바카라s PM left behind a semi-formally enunciated way of being for the country: the Gujral Doctrine. Still relevant in the Modi era? Yes, of course.
Indian and Chinese soldiers fight as the border row keeps flaring up in fits and starts
It바카라s an interesting menu of what-if options in history. Gujral바카라s tenure and his soft, unassuming persona may seem to belong to another epoch바카라the unilateral declaration of India바카라s muscular nationalism of a year later, Pokhran-II, would certainly not have happened had he continued. Nor its consequences: Kargil, and a decade of heightened conflict. But his legacy also endured as the other pole of India바카라s dichotomous foreign policy: in the strenuous peace-making of the Vajpayee-Manmohan years, the Lahore bus ride, the cricket diplomacy, an attempted détente in Kashmir. And with his 바카라Neighbourhood First바카라 stance, what Prime Minister Narendra Modi came into office with was his own variation on that doctrine. He had essentially borrowed Gujral바카라s idea바카라of paying greater attention to India바카라s smaller neighbours, nurturing relations within South Asia and beyond바카라and made it his own, with a few tweaks.
He made a statement by inviting all SAARC leaders for his oath-taking in 2014. That August, he travelled to Nepal and punched all the right buttons in his speech to Nepal바카라s Constituent Assembly바카라even Kathmandu바카라s streets weren바카라t immune to the excitement. Then, President Xi Jinping came calling in November and visited Ahmedabad, the PM바카라s home town바카라the first of many meetings. Contrary to what pundits may have predicted, Modi even tried to make peace with Pakistan, stopping over in Lahore on his way home from Afghanistan to greet Nawaz Sharif on his birthday on Christmas Day in 2015. It worked well for a while; then the Uri terror attack put a stop to those attempts. There has been no turning back since. By now, a year into his second term, the Neighbourhood First policy itself seems a historical relic.
This May 22, 2020, satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows a People바카라s Liberation Army (PLA) base in Galwan valley along the Line of Actual Control. Chinese and Indian commanders have agreed to disengage their forces in the disputed area after a clash left 20 Indian soldiers dead. The commanders reached the agreement on June 22 at their first meeting since the June 15 confrontation.
All of it was not due to Delhi바카라s miscalculation. Pakistan is genuinely difficult to predict and deal with so long as the army calls the shots. And a resurgent China under Xi has its own ambitions of a Sino-centric world order바카라for it, a Doklam or a Galwan Valley is a small piece on a chessboard that sizzles with bigger points of contention: Hong Kong, Taiwan, South China Sea, Senkaku바카라. To understand the difficulty with our other neighbours, one needs to return to Gujral. His doctrine was built around compassionate engagement: in Indian foreign policy, it marks a pole of maximal generosity of spirit. He wanted India to exude a more humane, gentler image to smaller neighbours daunted by India바카라s size and population. This was an attempt to reverse a legacy of paternalistic thinking in New Delhi, one that assumed a natural arc of influence바카라if not a formally writ one바카라over the affairs of independent countries in the subcontinent, some of whom were often seen as nothing more than protectorates. A former foreign secretary, in his ambassadorial days in Colombo, was even nicknamed the 바카라Viceroy바카라. It바카라s this unexamined machismo in India바카라s behaviour that Gujral wished to dial down, so as to engage as equals.
That core ethos has not necessarily accompanied every gesture by India, within its borders or without. Relations with 바카라Pakistan바카라 or 바카라Bangladesh바카라, for instance, cannot exactly go into realms of boundless bonhomie if the names get to be freely used as the nastiest cusswords within Indian discourse. In June 2015, hyperventilating Indian media reportage on a cross-border strike at NSCN(K) militants in Myanmar caused some embarrassment even with a friendly Naypyidaw. In September that year, all the warmth towards Modi바카라s India evaporated in Nepal as New Delhi initiated a nearly five-month-long blockade of the landlocked Himalayan nation, then freshly ravaged by one of its worst earthquakes. A top Indian diplomat, now in high office, was described as 바카라uncouth, brash and imperial바카라 in his conduct towards Nepal바카라s politicians. There was, to be sure, a perceptible gap between the intended spirit of 바카라Neighbourhood First바카라 and the actual execution. It is into this gap that China insinuated itself, investing its 바카라String of Pearls바카라 strategy towards the Indian Ocean Region with an extra buzz and purpose around India.
Paying greater attention to smaller neighbours바카라is still relevant
All the inroads China has been making into India바카라s 바카라backyard바카라 emanate here바카라and it바카라s not just about the Chinese ships and submarines that frequent the high seas. Take Xi바카라s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) across Asia: an astonishing bid to create a modern Silk Road network where all the world바카라s asphalt converges on Beijing. India is a lone big absentee; every other regional nation with the exception of Bhutan has signed up. Every country is in need of funds for infrastructure, and it바카라s difficult to resist China바카라s chequebook diplomacy. China now has a military base in Djibouti on the Horn of Africa바카라just like the US and old European powers. The latest flashpoint on India바카라s periphery바카라the bloody faceoff in Ladakh바카라is an extension of this new harnessing of territory. A kind of Chinese lebensraum. No wonder, India바카라s South Asian neighbours are watching the situation with interest바카라indeed, a touch of glee is not absent.
The presence of China hands all of India바카라s neighbours something substantial to leverage against what many of them perceive as a local bully바카라even if India has hardly exited the game. The Maldives had turned its back on New Delhi under Abdulla Yameen, welcoming China with open arms, but pulled back when the regime changed. In Colombo too, the Rajapaksa brothers are back in the saddle바카라President Gotabaya and PM Mahinda have struck all the right chords for now, but everyone knows the China card can always be brought out at critical moments. Even Dhaka has discovered a new bipolarity. Last week, China announced massive tariff exemptions to Bangladesh바카라on an astounding 97 per cent of its products. Even that left a bad aftertaste in Dhaka after a Calcutta-based Bengali daily described it as 바카라charity (khoyraati)바카라, though the paper apologised on June 23. 바카라Many are disappointed. This word is not acceptable to me,바카라 said foreign minister A.K. Abdul Momen바카라he stopped short of making a formal protest, using a more diplomatic tack. 바카라India is indeed our biggest friend,바카라 he said, and affixed a qualifier, 바카라India-China are both good friends, close neighbours바카라development partners바카라. Islamabad, of course, has no need for as many niceties, nor does the exchange stay verbal. The LoC remains red hot. It has been so ever since Uri/Pulwama바카라firing is common and casualties routine.
Via Kathmandu
But the new ambidexterity developed by Bangladesh is matched바카라indeed, surpassed바카라only by Nepal. Last week, Kathmandu issued a new map which showed three contested areas바카라the Lipulekh Pass (which connects Kumaon to Tibet), Kalapani and Limpiyadhura, some 370 sq km altogether바카라as its own. After Nepal바카라s parliament endorsed the new markings, India called on it to 바카라refrain from unjustified cartographic assertion바카라. Nepal has harked back to the 1816 Treaty of Sugauli signed with the East India Company to establish its claim to these slivers of land, located on the strategic India-China-Nepal trijunction. The Communist Party government of K.P. Sharma Oli is now sitting pretty and asking for foreign secretary-level talks바카라a kind of brinkmanship that could scarcely have been imagined earlier. 바카라Nepal has pushed itself into a corner by publishing the maps. Kalapani is in Indian territory, will they fight and take it from us?바카라바카라 asks former diplomat Gautam Bambawale. Asked whether Nepal would actually get together with China and Pakistan for a loose alliance against India, Kunda Dixit, editor, Nepali Times, retorts: 바카라Not a chance. If Indian media keep talking of Nepal바카라s generals and politicians tilting towards China, it may one day become a self-fulfilling prophecy. But ganging up is unlikely.바카라
Yet, a congruence is visible. The new map was triggered by India inaugurating the Lipulekh road last month, quite like how China resents India building roads, bridges and airstrips in border areas. The Ladakh faceoff has undoubtedly emboldened Kathmandu too. India is soft-peddling the issue, aware that much of this ultra-nationalism is domestic posturing Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli needs to do바카라and indeed goes back to the wave of anger triggered by India바카라s 2015 blockade. That was classic old-style India, acting on its 바카라natural sphere of influence바카라바카라strongly reminiscent of how a similar blunder by Rajiv Gandhi in 1989 had actually exacerbated anti-India sentiments, a fact the MEA바카라s institutional memory should have alerted it to.
When Nepal바카라s new Republican Constitution was unveiled in 2015, New Delhi took the side of the disenchanted Madheshis, a linguistic-demographic continuum from eastern India. Nepal, which transported 80 per cent of its essential supplies through India, was hit hard. And Oli, PM then, vowed never to repeat the strategic mistake of depending on one country. He turned to China and wrapped up a string of deals. Beijing also promised a rail line from Tibet to Kathmandu. Soon after the blockade was lifted, Oli was ousted바카라he suspected an Indian hand. His re-election campaign in 2017 focused on memories of the blockade, and promised those days of suffering would never recur. A thumping majority ensued, and while he has repaired ties with New Delhi, China now has a new omnipresence in Kathmandu.
The 바카라Bangladeshi바카라
Though less rancour-ridden, recent years have not been exactly salubrious for India바카라s ties with Bangladesh, one of our closest friends in the region, besides Bhutan. The Awami League government of Sheikh Hasina has always been India-friendly. But since 2019, the shadow of NRC/CAA has vitiated the air, what with loose talk of deporting alleged Bangladeshi migrants back home, and the equation of Bangladesh with Pakistan and Afghanistan as a country where religious minorities are persecuted. Hasina, whose regime prides itself on its secular-liberal values, said nothing much in public. But the Opposition and citizens바카라 groups planned open protests during Modi바카라s scheduled visit to Dhaka for Sheikh Mujibur Rahman바카라s 150 birth anniversary celebrations. The pandemic gave Dhaka an excuse to scale down the celebrations. The prime minister cancelled his visit. Altogether, not the best hour for diplomacy. Bambawale makes light of the issue. 바카라I don바카라t see how a foreign country can be impacted by India바카라s domestic issues, be it the scrapping of Article 370, the NRC or CAA. There are fissures within India, which Indians have to reconcile among themselves,바카라 he says. But domestic issues often have a way of resonating beyond borders바카라the same reason why New Delhi finds the Madheshi issue relevant enough to India to intervene in another country.
Army chief General M.M. Naravane meets soldiers in Ladakh during a visit to review the situation after the Galwan face-off with China
Using 바카라go to Pakistan바카라 as an all-purpose slur against dissidents, or describing Bangladeshi migrants as 바카라termites바카라 may resonate well with the BJP바카라s electorate. But it바카라s that very aggro that has given China new latitude in the subcontinent바카라thus contributing to India바카라s diminution here. Bambawale, an old China hand who has had long stints in Beijing, including as ambassador till his retirement in 2018, believes that바카라s offset by a larger gain. 바카라Don바카라t really know what China gained from the current crisis...making this hot border even hotter,바카라 he says. This view derives from the fact that there are circles within concentric circles here. If Madhesi-Nepal-India forms one loop, and that바카라s set inside the bigger one of Nepal-India-China, even that바카라s a subset of a bigger one. The world바카라s biggest tussle for dominance, the new not-so-Cold War, is raging between China and the US, along military, technological, trade and currency axes. India, in this picture, is analogous to the Madhesi of Nepal: a chess piece. 바카라They have pushed India closer to the US. With a hostile China looming large, India may be left with no option but to move closer to the US,바카라 says Bambawale. He feels China has lost out strategically for whatever small advantage gained in Galwan. India바카라s potential alternatives: linking up unambiguously with elements like the Quad or Donald Trump바카라s new-fangled Pacific Deterrence Initiative. India바카라s tilt towards the US dates from P.V. Narasimha Rao바카라s government in the years following the break-up of the USSR, gathered pace in the Vajpayee years and ripened during Manmohan Singh바카라s UPA regime with the 2005 India-US nuclear deal. As China바카라s global clout grew during those years, so grew a bipartisan consensus바카라spanning the Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama presidencies바카라about regarding India as a countervailing force to China in Asia.
At one time, there was much talk of India and China rising together in the 바카라Asian century바카라. That prospect still lives in deep economic ties바카라the thousands of million dollars of Chinese investment in India, in smartphone brands like Oppo, Vivo, Xiaomi and Huawei, in Indian brands like Paytm, Flipkart, Zomato, Makemytrip, Big Basket, Policy Bazaar, Ola et al. But the new trust deficit winds the clock back to 1962. Questions are being raised about the government바카라s China policy, whether Modi바카라s personal style of diplomacy has back-fired. Had the Wuhan spirit and the Mahabalipuram tete-a-tete lulled India into complacency? Has Modi바카라beginning with his four China visits as Gujarat CM, when he was not welcome in US or Europe바카라made the same mistake as Nehru by being too trusting? And within this matrix, what about the subcontinent? A new restraint is visible vis-à-vis China: not many party loudmouths are going ballistic on television shows. Can the same spirit be extended to our smaller neighbours?
Former diplomat Bhaswati Mukherjee believes this is a dilemma faced by any large country. Smaller neighbours naturally tend to be overly sensitive and often misinterpret the actions of a larger country. Modi바카라s overtures to Nawaz Sharif fell through 바카라because Pakistan did not play ball due to its own domestic reasons. It바카라s not India바카라s fault,바카라 she says. 바카라Under these circumstances, the only policy that stands up is not to be provoked.바카라 On China, it바카라s a question of a vigilant engagement, she says. 바카라China is doing what it does across Asia. It바카라s important to manage relations. But we must consider that this is 2020, not 1962. India is no pushover.바카라 A meaningful reboot of 바카라Neighbourhood First바카라 is perhaps overdue바카라and something like the Gujral Doctrine flows only from an inner confidence.
