On October 6 last year, the Bharatiya Janata Party바카라s (BJP) official X handle uploaded a poster of Rahul Gandhi dressed as Raavan, sporting metallic war-guards and seven heads. The muscular image of the Congress leader accompanied a politically charged caption: 바카라The new age Raavan is here. He is Evil. Anti-Dharma. Anti-Ram. His aim is to Destroy Bharat.바카라 Interestingly, this poster popped up just three months before the consecration ceremony of the Ram Temple, which was presided over by none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi himself.
The contest over the portrayals of Ram and Raavan in Indian political narratives is not new. In December 1974, a year after the death of Dravidian activist-scholar Periyar, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) supporters organised a Raavan Leela in Chennai (then Madras), where they burnt effigies of Ram, Lakshman and Sita. This Raavan Leela was a political response to Indira Gandhi바카라s participation in a Ram Leela event.
Even Maniyammai, DMK leader and Periyar바카라s wife, wrote in a letter to the former prime minister, 바카라Your participation in the Ram Leela, burning the effigy of the great Dravidian hero Ravanan, is against all canons of secularism and highly provoking and insulting to millions of Dravidians. Hence, I request you to desist from this dastardly act.바카라 In her response, Indira Gandhi emphasised the importance of the Ramayana and asked them to refrain from 바카라politicising바카라 the celebration.
Almost 50 years later, when her grandson was referred to as 바카라Raavan바카라, the entire Congress machinery protested, calling it 바카라downright dangerous and obnoxious바카라. Within two months, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge found himself in another Raavan-induced controversy when he asked whether PM Modi has 바카라100 heads like Raavan바카라. Although he made the comment to highlight the PM바카라s overwhelming presence in every election campaign바카라from municipality to Lok Sabha elections바카라the BJP interpreted it differently and criticised him for personally attacking Modi.
On the one hand, Raavan has traditionally been viewed as a 바카라demonic바카라 figure by major political parties largely run by Savarna politicians. On the other hand, Dalits and Adivasis have embraced the 바카라Raavan바카라 identity as a political assertion that has the potential to counter the 바카라Kamandal바카라 politics centred around Ram. UP-based Dalit leader Chandrashekhar Azad, who began his political journey by criticising Mayawati for failing to represent the Dalit cause, adopted Raavan as his moniker. Similarly, Adivasi leader Deviram Bhalavi of the Gondwana Gantantra Party removed 바카라Ram바카라 from his middle name, replacing it with 바카라Raavan바카라 to illustrate the ancient connection between the Gond Adivasis and their king.
The evocation of Raavan by marginalised communities, however, clashes with the Ram-centric political narratives of prominent north Indian politicians. Recently, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) drew inspiration from the Ramayana when Arvind Kejriwal resigned as Delhi chief minister after his release on bail. Upon taking over the CM바카라s chair, Atishi left a seat adjacent to hers vacant, stating that it was reserved for the exiled Ram while she governed. This act echoes the story of how Bharat, the prince of Ayodhya, placed Ram바카라s slippers on his throne during his 14-year exile.
Former deputy CM of Delhi, Manish Sisodia, also invoked the bond Ram and Lakshman shared, noting that unlike Lakshman, he was not even allowed to share the same cell with Kejriwal during their time in jail. This can be coupled with PM Modi바카라s frequent references to Ram Rajya to illustrate how the imagery of Ram shapes Indian political thought.
Will the competing images of Ram and Raavan influence the political future? As Bhalavi puts it, 바카라When Ram is invoked to justify violence, our ancestor Raavan바카라s position will be strengthened.바카라
