It was in 1952 when the Indian Republic held its first Parliament session. At that time, within the halls of power and decision-making historically dominated by men, were 39 women parliamentarians too. It was the beginning of a movement that hoped to see women at the pinnacle of authority one day. More than 75 years later, in the recently concluded Parliament session, 78 women parliamentarians were seated in the House. However, a closer look at the discourse and communication used within the halls shows the absence of gender-neutral language. Why then would ministers still respond to women MP/MLAs바카라 questions with 바카라Yes sir바카라.Â
Language has been one of the most powerful means through which sexism or gender stereotypes are reinforced within society. Salutations that include male pronouns such as 바카라sir바카라 or 바카라guys바카라 are often used to refer to both men and women. However, research has shown that such linguistic forms have the negative effects of making women disappear in mental representations. In the context of language used within the Parliament of India, which is the Supreme Legislative body of the country, references to women parliamentarians, including the first woman tribal President Droupadi Murmu, using male pronouns continues unabated.Â
Gender neutral languageÂ
In September 2022, Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi raised similar concerns in a letter addressed to Union Minister of Parliamentary Affairs Pralhad Joshi, saying that use of the phrase 바카라no sir바카라 in response to questions asked by women parliamentarians was 바카라concerning바카라. Following the letter, the Rajya Sabha decided to use gender-neutral terms in responses to parliamentary questions from the next session onwards.Â
The reply from the Rajya Sabha secretariat, dated September 20, 2022, reads, 바카라All proceedings of the House (including replies to Parliamentary questions) are addressed to the chairperson... However, ministries will be informed to furnish gender-neutral replies... from the next session of Rajya Sabha onwards."
However, the recently-concluded Parliament session, which witnessed an uproar over the violence in Manipur, a debate on no-confidence motion against the Narendra-Modi government and a statement by the PM hailing the government바카라s achievements, still lagged behind in inclusivity.Â
Parliament Monsoon Session 2023
While an approximate count of usage of male pronouns to refer to women parliamentarians could not be made, an overwhelming use of 바카라yes sir바카라 was found in responses to questions asked by women leaders.
Two women MPs and two men MPs posed a question to the Minister of Home Affairs on cases of harassment against women in the country; whether there was an increase, how many accused have been convicted and whether the Government plans to constitute a committee to prevent the violence against women. The response to the last question (on formation of committee) which was given by Minister of State in MHA, Ajay Kumar Mishra, said, 바카라Sir, at present, no such plan is under consideration.바카라 Ironically, a question posed by two women leaders on women harassment was responded to using male pronouns.
In another instance, AITC MP Sajda Ahmed posed a question to the Minister of Home Affairs on auction of enemy properties; whether the government has initiated the auction, if there is a list of enemy properties that are to be auctioned etc. The response, yet again started with 바카라Yes sir바카라.Â
Rajya Sabha member Darshana Singh posed a question to the Minister of Tourism, on whether the government is aware of the total number of tourists in the country, if so, the specific details of the number of tourists. To this, the Minister of Tourism G Kishan Reddy began the response with 바카라Yes sir바카라.Â
According to a report by The Hindu in June 2022, references to inherently masculine pronouns are made over 150 times in the Rules of Procedure in Rajya Sabha and 600 times in the Constitution of India. In a compilation of ministerial replies to questions from the 17th Lok Sabha in that year, for 75 women Parliamentarians, it was found that 84% of the answers that used salutations (sir/madam) referred to women Parliamentarians as 바카라sir바카라. During the 15th Lok Sabha, when we had a woman Speaker, only about 27% of the answers made this error.Â
바카라Rashtrapati바카라 debate
In July 2022, Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury referred to the President of India Draupadi Murmu as 바카라Rashtrapatni바카라. The incident sparked a row, despite the Congress leader tendering a written apology, admitting that it was a slip of tongue.
However, it stirred up a debate on lack of gender-neutral terms to address the President. The President in India is called 바카라Rashtrapati바카라 in Hindi. 바카라Rashtra바카라 means nation and 바카라Pati바카라 literally means husband. The issue was first raised when Pratibha Patil was elected as India바카라s first woman president in 2007. Some linguist experts had argued then that the word 바카라pati바카라 in this context doesn바카라t literally mean husband, and is used to refer to a master or custodian. Social activist and human rights campaigner Shabnam Hashmi had then said, 바카라Mantri also doesn바카라t reflect gender. But the moment you use 바카라pati바카라 or 바카라patni바카라, there are other connotations too.바카라
The debate fizzled away after Pratibha Patil바카라s term as two male presidents took over the office subsequently 바카라 Pranab Mukherjee and Ramnath Kovind. However, with President Murmu taking over the office, the term used to refer to the post needs a crucial debate once again.Â
Gender bias in language to gender bias in society
In her book Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, Caroline Criado Perez writes that: 바카라Seeing men as the human default is fundamental to the structure of human society.바카라 She further explains that male bias is so firmly embedded in our psyche that even genuinely gender-neutral words [like doctor or actor] are read as male. How we speak affects how we think and how we interpret the world around us.
The gender biased terms or phrases used in the parliament often go beyond 바카라sir바카라 and 바카라madam바카라. For instance, last year, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Chandrakant Patil told Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) MP Supriya Sule to 바카라go home and cook바카라 instead of being in politics, reiterating the long-existing patriarchal attitude and hierarchy of how politics is a profession only for 바카라men바카라.Â
Women바카라s representation in the national parliament is a key factor to determine the extent of gender equality in parliamentary politics. In India however, women account for 14% representation in the Lok Sabha and 11% in the Rajya Sabha. Shouldn바카라t it be inexcusable, that in a country where women account for half of the population, they are still seen, spoken to and treated as inferior to that of their counterparts? Â