Premier League clubs have held private talks with the promoter of the European Super League since a landmark court ruling in December, the promoter바카라s chief executive has said. (More Football News)
English football바카라s co-called 바카라big six바카라 바카라 Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United and Tottenham 바카라 were founder members of the original Super League project in April 2021 but quickly withdrew amid fan protests and pressure from the football authorities and the British Government.
All six publicly distanced themselves from efforts to launch a new competition in the wake of a ruling from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on December 21, but Bernd Reichart, the chief executive of A22 which promotes the Super League concept, insists English clubs have been involved in dialogue with his organisation since then.
Asked directly whether there had been conversations with Premier League teams since the ECJ ruling, Reichart told the PA news agency: 바카라Yes of course. It바카라s absolutely a logical and natural process.
바카라Everyone is trying to get a sense of what the ruling could mean, it바카라s the professional obligation of clubs to know what this change in club governance in Europe could mean for them.
바카라It바카라s a great opportunity, why shouldn바카라t everybody have a look at it neutrally and decide what바카라s best for their clubs, their members and their fans? We are aware that clubs all over Europe are currently involved in that process and we try to assist them and help them.바카라
The ECJ said UEFA바카라s criteria governing how rival competition organisers access the market must be transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportionate.
Reichart said there were clubs in Europe who had publicly declared support for UEFA and its existing competitions who have subsequently held new talks with A22.
바카라There바카라s still a situation where (clubs) hate getting calls from the political establishment every time they stick their head out of the window,바카라 Reichart said.
바카라We haven바카라t put out a deadline, we haven바카라t said 바카라this ship is sailing now바카라 and we haven바카라t invited people to come out with declarations because we don바카라t want (other clubs) to then get calls saying 바카라now you have to counter that declaration which came out of your domestic league바카라.
바카라This is not an initiative which tries to divide the football community into two parts. I think it바카라s absolutely fair and good for us to talk with those clubs off the record, not out in the daylight, so that they are not pressured, not co-opted, so that they can actually contribute and make up their mind.
바카라In the UK you still have a lot of misconceptions that have to be challenged and we have to explain ourselves better.
바카라But even the concept of breaking away, or inviting clubs to leave the Premier League, that was never the intention of this initiative and it never will be.바카라
Reichart admitted the Super League concept 바카라resonated more easily바카라 with clubs in the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) compared to their English counterparts.
바카라They are in a situation where their domestic TV revenues, which is their main base of income, is just losing competitiveness year after year to bigger leagues,바카라 Reichart said.
바카라They would love to be more exposed to a bigger, united European single market that helps them retain their talent, make their investments and stay competitive. This is a rationale that is resonating with Scottish clubs more easily than with English clubs, who are part of the wealthiest domestic league.바카라
A court in Madrid is set to hear the Super League case again on Thursday, having now received the answers to the questions it asked the ECJ about whether UEFA바카라s 2021 rules which blocked the Super League바카라s formation were anti-competitive.
