There has been an extraordinary war of words among the leaders backing the secession of Jammu and Kashmir from India, refÂlecting the ideological, political and tactical differences among the various secessionist groups and the challenge the mentors of jehad face from the next generation of militants.
On April 2, a masked militant said at the grave of his slain comrade: 바카라We want Islamic system in Kashmir. We have stood up not for any organisation or Pakistan but for Islam.바카라 He then asked the people not to wave the 바카라un-Islamic바카라 Pakistani flag.
War of words
In response, the leaders of the three organisations spearheading the secessionist movement, Syed Ali Shah Geelani, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and MuhÂammad Yasin Malik, issued a joint statement on May 9. They said that the Kashmir issue is political and that the ongoing agitation is indigenous and not associated with organisations like IS and Al-Qaeda. They blamed 바카라Indian agencies for maligning the movement under a well-thought-out plan바카라.
This statement led Zakir Musa, head of the Hizb-ul-Mujahedeen, to launch a fierce attack on the secÂessionist leaders. He said: 바카라Our struggle is for implementation of Sharia. It is an Islamic struggle.바카라 He then warned the Hurriyat leaders: 바카라If they again try to become thorns in our path, the first thing we will do is behead you and hang you in Lal Chowk.바카라
Musa raised some pertinent questions about Hurriyat바카라s tactics when he asked: 바카라If this is a political struggle, then why you people have been using mosques for politics, why have you been using the pulpits of the mosques for a political struggle?바카라
The Pakistan-based United Jehad Council, which includes the Hizb-ul-Mujahedeen, then strongly rejected Musa바카라s remarks and the negative references to Pakistan. This further inflamed Musa, who said: 바카라If we are fighting for azadi to establish a secular state, then we are not martyrs; then my blood will not be spilled for it.바카라 With this, he resigned from the leadership of Hizb and gave the clarion call: 바카라Sharia ya shahadat바카라 (Sharia or martyrdom).
While the Hurriyat leaders have regretted this break in the ranks of the militants and called for unity against Indian machinations, two Pakistan-based jehadi organisations have applauded Musa바카라s position. The Al-Qaeda in South Asia (AQIS) praÂised him for distancing the Kashmir struggle from Pakistan and emphasising the centrality of jehad to establish Islamic rule. The AQIS mouth-piece added: 바카라This fight is for establishing Sharia, it is not the fight of any terrorist group or Pakistan, which itself is a non-Islamic state.바카라
The other source of support for Musa is the TehÂÂrÂeek-e-Taliban Pakistan. Its commander, Haji ManÂsoor Mehsood, praised Musa for freeing the Kashmir jehad from the shackles of Pakistan-infÂluenced agencies and its 바카라central perfidious leadership바카라.
Zakir Musa바카라s outburst has exposed two deep fault-lines in the Kashmir secessionist movement: one, betÂÂween the Pakistan-sponsored jehadi militants and their Hurriyat associates in the Kashmir valley, and the other between a new generation of jehadis and the Pakistani institutions that spawned them.
The Hurriyat
Till 1987, almost all political groups in Jammu and Kashmir, while divided ideologically and politically, acted within the framework of the Indian ConÂstitution and sought power and influence through the ballot box. Believing that the 1987 elections were rigged to their disadvantage, they now backed secessionist movements organised from Pakistan.
While the Pakistan-sponsored agitation in Kashmir was initially spearheaded by the 바카라secular바카라 Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front (JKLF), the latter was soon sidelined with the emergence of Islamic extremist groups on the Kashmir stage, so that the secessionist militancy sponsored by Pakistan now became stridently Islamic and pro-Pakistan in character.
Syed Ali Shah Geelani and the Jamaat-e-Islami headed by him played a major role in providing ideological support to the Kashmir jehad, shaping the ideological orientation of two outfits, the Hizb-ul-Mujahideen and the Hizb-e-Islami. By early 1990, Islamic militancy had become the central force in the state, aggravating the communal divÂide by targeting Hindu and Sikh communities, as also Muslim supporters of the accession to India.
The All-Party Hurriyat Conference (APHC), which brought together 26 political, religious and social organisations, was set up in March 1993 (widely suspected to have been sponsored by US thinktanks, with possible US diplomatic support) as a united political front to promote the secession of Jammu and Kashmir from India. Its constitution calls for: a peaceful struggle of the people of the state to exercise the right of self-determination; a negotiated settlement of the Kashmir dispute between India, Pakistan and the people of the state, and the need to publicise the struggle globally to expose India바카라s 바카라illegal occupation바카라 of the state.
Musa and the Hurriyat
Both Musa and the Hurriyat leaders give a central place to Islam in defining the Kashmir struggle. Where they disagree is regarding the commitment to a 바카라secular바카라 Kashmir on the part of Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and the commitment to affiliation with Pakistan on Geelani바카라s part.
Geelani is the self-avowed hardliner in the Hurriyat pantheon. Ideologically, he has hardly any differences with Zakir Musa, having mentored his organisation, Hizb-ul-Mujahedeen, in its formative stages. Where he parts company from Musa is regarding Kashmir바카라s ties with Pakistan. In 2008, Geelani said Pakistan had been created as the home of Islam, and 바카라just as Pakistan belonged to Kashmir, Kashmir belonged to Pakistan바카라.
Mirwaiz Omar Farooq is considered a moderate because he has kept aloof from militant groups, though he has not condemned their violence. While committed to the fulfilment of Kashmiri aspirations, he continues to give lip-service to the state바카라s eclectic traditions. His belief-system is simply set out thus: 바카라The State has to have secular credentials where minorities are protected and rights of the dispossessed assured.바카라
New generation of jehadis
But, Zakir Musa reflects a deeper problem regarding militancy in Kashmir. Since 1989, jehad has been assiduously promoted by Pakistan바카라s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), which indoctrinated, armed and trained the militants, and sent them into India to keep the Kashmir issue alive before the international community, even as the domestic resolution of the conflict became increasingly difficult, and over time India바카라s national values of moderation and accommodation got corroded.
The principal role in this regard has been played by jehadi outfits organised in Pakistan and given appropriate doctrinal and operational support. These outfits have thus far been creatures of ISI diktat.
Not anymore. Today, a new generation of jehadis has emerged in Pakistan, which is made up of younger members who are doctrinally more rigid, operationally more ruthless, and politically more independent of their sponsors. They are inspired by the 바카라Islamic State바카라, though not linked with it organisationally, and have ties with various local groups affiliated with Al-Qaeda.
They are making themselves felt in Kashmir, where they are inspiring a new generation of militants as well as street demonstrators. Thus, the spokesman of the Kashmiri Taliban has said that Zakir Musa is on the 바카라right track바카라 and it will target 바카라anti-freedom struggle forces바카라 in India, a dire warning to Hurriyat leaders.
These developments cannot bring any comfort to India. As ISI loses control and the Hurriyat becÂomes irrelevant, there will be no credible interÂlocutors left to pursue the peace process.
(The author is a former diplomat)
